A microneurovascular TRAM flap does not compromise abdominal sensibility more than a conventional one.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Classic abdominoplasty for a transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction impairs abdominal somatosensory function at the donor site. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the type of surgical procedure has an effect on somatosensory alterations of abdominal skin after TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
[METHODS] Sixty patients (mean ± SD age, 50 ± 6.0 years) who underwent microvascular TRAM flap breast reconstruction and 20 healthy subjects (control group; mean age, 46 ± 6.7 years) participated in the study. Twenty patients had bilateral-nerve anastomosis, 20 had single-nerve anastomosis, and 20 underwent no nerve dissection for the TRAM flap. Clinical sensory examination and tactile and thermal quantitative sensory testing were performed and a patient questionnaire was administered at a mean of 2 to 4.5 years after surgery.
[RESULTS] All surgical techniques produced significant sensory impairment below the umbilicus, but there were no significant differences in total sensibility scores between the groups with single-nerve (mean sensibility score, 21.98 ± 2.7) and double-nerve (mean sensibility score, 20.71 ± 3.6) anastomosis of the TRAM flap. The best sensibility scores were found in the group with single-nerve dissection. Fifteen percent of patients complained of mild pain, and 13 percent felt occasional tactile hyperesthesia in their abdominal skin, mostly around the umbilicus and scars.
[CONCLUSIONS] In this study, unilateral or bilateral nerve dissection when preparing and lifting a TRAM flap did not seem to increase sensory alterations or postoperative pain in the abdominal donor site after breast reconstruction surgery. Cautious microneurovascular dissection techniques may even improve sensory recovery of the abdominal skin after TRAM flap breast reconstruction surgery.
[METHODS] Sixty patients (mean ± SD age, 50 ± 6.0 years) who underwent microvascular TRAM flap breast reconstruction and 20 healthy subjects (control group; mean age, 46 ± 6.7 years) participated in the study. Twenty patients had bilateral-nerve anastomosis, 20 had single-nerve anastomosis, and 20 underwent no nerve dissection for the TRAM flap. Clinical sensory examination and tactile and thermal quantitative sensory testing were performed and a patient questionnaire was administered at a mean of 2 to 4.5 years after surgery.
[RESULTS] All surgical techniques produced significant sensory impairment below the umbilicus, but there were no significant differences in total sensibility scores between the groups with single-nerve (mean sensibility score, 21.98 ± 2.7) and double-nerve (mean sensibility score, 20.71 ± 3.6) anastomosis of the TRAM flap. The best sensibility scores were found in the group with single-nerve dissection. Fifteen percent of patients complained of mild pain, and 13 percent felt occasional tactile hyperesthesia in their abdominal skin, mostly around the umbilicus and scars.
[CONCLUSIONS] In this study, unilateral or bilateral nerve dissection when preparing and lifting a TRAM flap did not seem to increase sensory alterations or postoperative pain in the abdominal donor site after breast reconstruction surgery. Cautious microneurovascular dissection techniques may even improve sensory recovery of the abdominal skin after TRAM flap breast reconstruction surgery.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | tram flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 7 | |
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 5 | |
| 시술 | abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | microvascular
|
미세수술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | single-nerve
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | nerve
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | abdominal skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal somatosensory
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | TRAM flap breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | umbilicus
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal donor
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | TRAM
→ transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Classic
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | bilateral-nerve anastomosis
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | pain
|
C0030193
Pain
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | tactile hyperesthesia
|
C0751215
Hyperesthesia, Tactile
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | increase sensory alterations or postoperative pain
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | somatosensory
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | microneurovascular TRAM flap
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | microvascular TRAM flap
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | bilateral-nerve
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | bilateral nerve
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | microneurovascular
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Abdomen; Abdominoplasty; Adult; Anastomosis, Surgical; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Neurologic Examination; Pain; Pain Measurement; Peripheral Nerves; Sensation Disorders; Skin; Surgical Flaps; Touch Perception
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.