Postoperative analgesic effect of locally infiltrated levobupivacaine in fleur-de-Lys abdominoplasty.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] This prospective double-blind study compared the analgesic properties of locally infiltrated levobupivacaine with those of ropivacaine in fleur-de-lys abdominoplasty.
[METHODS] A total of 46 patients subjected to fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty under general anesthesia were included. The patients were randomly assigned to receive local infiltration of the peri-incisional and dissected area with the following solutions: group A (placebo group, n = 15) received 100 ml of saline 0.9%, group B (n = 15) received 50 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% in 50 ml of saline 0.9%, and group C (n = 16) received 60 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25% in 40 ml of saline 0.9%. The anesthetic technique was standardized for all the groups. The patients were asked to assess their pain at rest on a visual analog scale (VAS) at 2 h, 4 h, and 24 h postoperatively. Data were analyzed by mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA), simple ANOVA, and repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey's test.
[RESULTS] Groups B and C did not differ significantly in their VAS scores at 2 h postoperatively, but group C experienced significantly less pain (p < 0.001) than either the control group or the B group at 4 h and 24 h postoperatively. Group B also registered significantly lower VAS scores (p < 0.001) than the placebo group at 4 h postoperatively.
[CONCLUSIONS] It is concluded that for mini abdominoplasty, adequate analgesia is achieved for at least 4 h postoperatively by local tissue infiltration with either ropivacaine or levobupivacaine. However, in terms of intensity and duration of analgesia, levobupivacaine was found to be more effective than ropivacaine in reducing postoperative pain associated with mini abdominoplasty.
[METHODS] A total of 46 patients subjected to fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty under general anesthesia were included. The patients were randomly assigned to receive local infiltration of the peri-incisional and dissected area with the following solutions: group A (placebo group, n = 15) received 100 ml of saline 0.9%, group B (n = 15) received 50 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% in 50 ml of saline 0.9%, and group C (n = 16) received 60 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25% in 40 ml of saline 0.9%. The anesthetic technique was standardized for all the groups. The patients were asked to assess their pain at rest on a visual analog scale (VAS) at 2 h, 4 h, and 24 h postoperatively. Data were analyzed by mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA), simple ANOVA, and repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey's test.
[RESULTS] Groups B and C did not differ significantly in their VAS scores at 2 h postoperatively, but group C experienced significantly less pain (p < 0.001) than either the control group or the B group at 4 h and 24 h postoperatively. Group B also registered significantly lower VAS scores (p < 0.001) than the placebo group at 4 h postoperatively.
[CONCLUSIONS] It is concluded that for mini abdominoplasty, adequate analgesia is achieved for at least 4 h postoperatively by local tissue infiltration with either ropivacaine or levobupivacaine. However, in terms of intensity and duration of analgesia, levobupivacaine was found to be more effective than ropivacaine in reducing postoperative pain associated with mini abdominoplasty.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 3 | |
| 시술 | mini abdominoplasty
|
복부성형술 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | peri-incisional
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | levobupivacaine
|
C0873118
levobupivacaine
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | ropivacaine
|
C0073571
ropivacaine
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | saline
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] Groups B
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | pain
|
C0030193
Pain
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | postoperative pain
|
C0030201
Pain, Postoperative
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Abdomen; Adult; Amides; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analysis of Variance; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Levobupivacaine; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Postoperative Pain; Patient Satisfaction; Prospective Studies; Ropivacaine; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.
- What is the potential role of the nonopioid suzetrigine in pain management?
- Ex Vivo and In Vivo Histological Evaluation of a 3-μm Wavelength, 40-μm Spot Size Fractional Laser System for Dermatology.
- Correspondence on "Lymphatic pathway remodeling in the supraumbilical region after abdominoplasty: A prospective cohort study".
- Sculpting Success-The TULUANHA: Modified TULUA Lipo-Abdominoplasty in Post-Bariatric Body Contouring.