Avoiding early revision rhytidectomy: a biomechanical comparison of tissue plication suture techniques.

The Laryngoscope 2008 Vol.118(12) p. 2107-10

White JB, Barraja M, Mengesha T, Bose S, Ashktorab S, Bahn R, Vallance R, Lindsey WH

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Manipulation and suspension of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) is performed by 74% of rhytidectomy surgeons. Multiple variations in suture techniques are employed in this task, but they have never been evaluated for differences in their ability to withstand stress.

[OBJECTIVE] To compare the biomechanical properties of two different suture techniques that are used in SMAS plications during rhytidectomy: a double-layered running locking (DRL) stitch and multiple horizontal mattress stitches.

[METHODS] Fourteen horizontal mattress plications, in rows of six sutures, and comparable lengths of 16 DRL stitch plications of pig skin samples, were stressed using a tensometer with grip displacement increasing at a constant rate of 0.5 cm/Min. The required force to cause plication failure was recorded for each sample at three suture break points.

[RESULTS] There was no significant difference between the two groups in the force required to cause the initial suture failure. Unlike the horizontal mattress plication, an initial break seemed to cause minimal to no distortion of the DRL tissue plication. When results were normalized by the initial break forces to account for small variations in tissue properties, the force ratio required to cause a second suture break was significantly larger in the DRL group than in the horizontal mattress technique. This is evidenced by the average second to first break force ratios of 1.62 vs. 1.13 for the DRL and horizontal mattress stitches, respectively, with a P-value of .60. The mean ratios of third to first break forces for the DRL and horizontal mattress groups were 2.08 and 0.91, respectively, with a P-value of .08.

[CONCLUSION] The DRL stitch requires more force than the horizontal mattress stitch to cause significant failure of tissue plication. This technique may enable plastic surgeons to avoid early revision rhytidectomy due to suture failure, and to create a long-lasting, youthful cosmetic result.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 rhytidectomy 안면거상술 dict 4
해부 smas 표재성근건막계 dict 2
해부 superficial musculoaponeurotic system 표재성근건막계 dict 1
해부 tissue scispacy 1
합병증 superficial musculoaponeurotic scispacy 1
합병증 SMAS plications scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVE] scispacy 1
질환 failure of tissue plication scispacy 1
기타 pig skin scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Animals; Biomechanical Phenomena; Dermatologic Surgical Procedures; Facial Muscles; Humans; Methods; Models, Theoretical; Polyethylene Terephthalates; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation; Rhytidoplasty; Skin; Suture Techniques; Swine; Tensile Strength; Weight-Bearing; Wound Healing

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문