Complications of Cartilage Sparing Otoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] To study the prevalence of complications in patients who have undergone cartilage sparing otoplasty.
[METHODS] On December 26, 2021, the authors searched 8 databases using the search term "(otoplasty) AND (cartilage sparing OR cartilage sparing)" for collecting the most appropriate studies. The authors used R software version 4.1.2 for conducting the meta-analysis.
[RESULTS] Of the 414 records screened, the authors included 14 studies. Recurrence/reoperation was the most common reported complication with a prevalence of 4.27% (95% CI: 2.93-6.22), followed by suture erosion 2.46% (95% CI: 0.86-7.07) and hematoma/hemorrhage 1.34% (95% CI: 0.79-2.27). The authors did not find any significant difference between cartilage sparing and cartilage scoring in terms of recurrence/reoperation [odds ratio (OR): 0.92; 95% CI: 0.53-1.60; P = 0.766], hematoma/hemorrhage (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.28-7.01; P = 0.688), and wound infection (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.06-2.24; P = 0.279).
[CONCLUSION] Various complications have been reported, including recurrence and reoperation, hematoma, wound infections, suture erosions, keloid formation, and skin necrosis. However, the prevalence of these events is not high, although significant heterogeneity was reported for some outcomes. Therefore, it can be concluded that cartilage sparing otoplasty is a safe and reproducible technique.
[METHODS] On December 26, 2021, the authors searched 8 databases using the search term "(otoplasty) AND (cartilage sparing OR cartilage sparing)" for collecting the most appropriate studies. The authors used R software version 4.1.2 for conducting the meta-analysis.
[RESULTS] Of the 414 records screened, the authors included 14 studies. Recurrence/reoperation was the most common reported complication with a prevalence of 4.27% (95% CI: 2.93-6.22), followed by suture erosion 2.46% (95% CI: 0.86-7.07) and hematoma/hemorrhage 1.34% (95% CI: 0.79-2.27). The authors did not find any significant difference between cartilage sparing and cartilage scoring in terms of recurrence/reoperation [odds ratio (OR): 0.92; 95% CI: 0.53-1.60; P = 0.766], hematoma/hemorrhage (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.28-7.01; P = 0.688), and wound infection (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.06-2.24; P = 0.279).
[CONCLUSION] Various complications have been reported, including recurrence and reoperation, hematoma, wound infections, suture erosions, keloid formation, and skin necrosis. However, the prevalence of these events is not high, although significant heterogeneity was reported for some outcomes. Therefore, it can be concluded that cartilage sparing otoplasty is a safe and reproducible technique.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | otoplasty
|
귀성형술 | dict | 4 | |
| 합병증 | hematoma
|
혈종 | dict | 3 | |
| 해부 | Cartilage
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | wound
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | wound infection
|
감염 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | skin necrosis
|
괴사 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | keloid
|
켈로이드 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | hematoma/hemorrhage
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | infections
|
C0851162
Infections of musculoskeletal system
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | necrosis
|
C0027540
Necrosis
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Comparative efficacy of intralesional therapies for keloid scars: a network meta-analysis.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Otoplasty for prominent ear: A systematic review of surgical techniques.
- Combined minimally invasive lymphatic microsurgery and aligned nanofibrillar collagen scaffold for refractory post-traumatic eyelid lymphedema: A case report.
- Tranexamic Acid in Reconstructive Microsurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.