Effectiveness and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Chin Augmentation and Correction of Chin Retrusion: A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The chin significantly influences facial aesthetics, contributing to the overall balance and harmony of the face. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the hyaluronic acid filler Hyamax® Volumizer for chin augmentation and correction of chin retrusion compared to a no-treatment control.
[METHODS] Participants aged 18-55 years with mild to moderate chin retrusion were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either the treatment group (n = 150) or control group (n = 50). Evaluations included blinded assessments using the validated Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale for aesthetic enhancement, and safety follow-up.
[RESULTS] The Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale responder rate (≥1 grade improvement) was significantly higher for the treatment group (70%) compared to the control group (0%) at 6 months (p < 0.0001), and remained higher at 12 months (54.67% vs. 0%; p < 0.0001). Aesthetic improvement rates were consistently high as reported by both blinded evaluating investigator (≥89.33%) and subjects (≥91.33%). Treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate.
[CONCLUSION] Hyamax® Volumizer treatment is safe and effective when injected in the chin to treat chin retrusion, with results lasting through 1 year.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
[METHODS] Participants aged 18-55 years with mild to moderate chin retrusion were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either the treatment group (n = 150) or control group (n = 50). Evaluations included blinded assessments using the validated Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale for aesthetic enhancement, and safety follow-up.
[RESULTS] The Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale responder rate (≥1 grade improvement) was significantly higher for the treatment group (70%) compared to the control group (0%) at 6 months (p < 0.0001), and remained higher at 12 months (54.67% vs. 0%; p < 0.0001). Aesthetic improvement rates were consistently high as reported by both blinded evaluating investigator (≥89.33%) and subjects (≥91.33%). Treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate.
[CONCLUSION] Hyamax® Volumizer treatment is safe and effective when injected in the chin to treat chin retrusion, with results lasting through 1 year.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | chin augmentation
|
턱끝성형술 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | hyaluronic acid filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 2 | |
| 재료 | hyaluronic acid
|
히알루론산 | dict | 2 | |
| 합병증 | chin retrusion
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] The
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Adult; Female; Chin; Prospective Studies; Dermal Fillers; Male; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Middle Aged; Cosmetic Techniques; Adolescent; Esthetics; Follow-Up Studies; Patient Satisfaction; Risk Assessment; Single-Blind Method
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Choroidal ischemia after self-injection of hyaluronic acid filler.
- Intra-articular therapies for synovial joint dysfunction: a comprehensive integrative review.
- Clinical safety of a low-modification hyaluronic acid filler (MoD 2%) for facial rejuvenation.
- Long-term effects of inferior alveolar nerve injury on the quality of life of orthognathic patients: a clinical assessment.