Relationship of the Degree of Nerve Exposure and Surgical Manipulation and Short-Term Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Prospective Study.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Neurosensory disturbance (NSD) is a common complication after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) due to inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. The impact of intraoperative nerve manipulation on NSD remains debated.
[PURPOSE] The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of IAN exposure and manipulation during SSRO on functional sensory recovery (FSR).
[STUDY DESIGN] This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of 40 patients undergoing SSRO at Mahidol University from December 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients aged 20-34, ASA Class I-II. The exclusion criteria were patients with systemic bone disease, history of head and neck or neurological pathology, previous SSRO, or incomplete data collection.
[PREDICTOR VARIABLE] Degree of intraoperative nerve manipulation was divided by the attending surgeon as follows; 1) Nerve fully encased in distal segment and not visible (NS); 2) Nerve encased in distal segment but partially visible (DS); and 3) Nerve partially encased in proximal segment and fully dissected free (PS).
[OUTCOME VARIABLES] The area of interest was divided into the lip and chin. The primary outcome was time to FSR. The secondary outcome was subjective patient report, using a visual analogue scale, compared to FSR.
[COVARIATES] The covariates were sex, age, skeletal diagnosis, degree of movement, and concomitant genioplasty/subapical procedure.
[ANALYSES] Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Mcnemar test were utilized. P-value < .05 was significant.
[RESULTS] In the lip, the median times to FSR were NS, 2 days; DS, 45 days; PS, 102 days. (Interquartile range: 77,127, 114, respectively) In the chin, the median times to FSR were NS, 23 days; DS, 92 days; PS, 87 days. (Interquartile range: 77, 161, 101, respectively.) Nerve manipulation significantly affected FSR in the lip and chin (P = .001, <0.001, respectively. Cox hazard ratios for DS and PS were lower compared to NS. Patients consistently reported more NSD compared to FSR as per Mcnemar test.
[CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE] After SSRO, FSR in the lip is prolonged when the IAN is partially encased in the proximal segment and released. This raises the question of the efficacy of surgically releasing a partially encased IAN.
[PURPOSE] The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of IAN exposure and manipulation during SSRO on functional sensory recovery (FSR).
[STUDY DESIGN] This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of 40 patients undergoing SSRO at Mahidol University from December 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients aged 20-34, ASA Class I-II. The exclusion criteria were patients with systemic bone disease, history of head and neck or neurological pathology, previous SSRO, or incomplete data collection.
[PREDICTOR VARIABLE] Degree of intraoperative nerve manipulation was divided by the attending surgeon as follows; 1) Nerve fully encased in distal segment and not visible (NS); 2) Nerve encased in distal segment but partially visible (DS); and 3) Nerve partially encased in proximal segment and fully dissected free (PS).
[OUTCOME VARIABLES] The area of interest was divided into the lip and chin. The primary outcome was time to FSR. The secondary outcome was subjective patient report, using a visual analogue scale, compared to FSR.
[COVARIATES] The covariates were sex, age, skeletal diagnosis, degree of movement, and concomitant genioplasty/subapical procedure.
[ANALYSES] Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Mcnemar test were utilized. P-value < .05 was significant.
[RESULTS] In the lip, the median times to FSR were NS, 2 days; DS, 45 days; PS, 102 days. (Interquartile range: 77,127, 114, respectively) In the chin, the median times to FSR were NS, 23 days; DS, 92 days; PS, 87 days. (Interquartile range: 77, 161, 101, respectively.) Nerve manipulation significantly affected FSR in the lip and chin (P = .001, <0.001, respectively. Cox hazard ratios for DS and PS were lower compared to NS. Patients consistently reported more NSD compared to FSR as per Mcnemar test.
[CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE] After SSRO, FSR in the lip is prolonged when the IAN is partially encased in the proximal segment and released. This raises the question of the efficacy of surgically releasing a partially encased IAN.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | genioplasty
|
턱끝성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | IAN
→ inferior alveolar nerve
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | bone
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | skeletal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | FSR
→ functional sensory recovery
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | lip
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | ramus osteotomy
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | lip
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | chin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OUTCOME VARIABLES]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSION AND
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Neurosensory Disturbance
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | NSD
→ Neurosensory disturbance
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | bone disease
|
C0005940
Bone Diseases
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | head and neck or neurological pathology
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | FSR
→ functional sensory recovery
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | head and neck
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | lip
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | alveolar nerve
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Class
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus; Prospective Studies; Mandible; Trigeminal Nerve Injuries; Mandibular Nerve
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Long-term effects of inferior alveolar nerve injury on the quality of life of orthognathic patients: a clinical assessment.
- Mapping the Mandibular Lingual Foramina for Safer Chin Surgery: CT Morphometry and Predictive Modeling.
- Effectiveness and Safety of a Polyvinyl Alcohol Microsphere and Hyaluronic Acid Suspension for Chin Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Multidisciplinary Study.
- Safety and Effectiveness of Two High-G' Soft Tissue Fillers for Chin Augmentation: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparator-Controlled, Evaluator-Blinded Trial.
- Minimally Invasive Protocol for the Management of Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: Case Series on Seven Patients.