Medpore versus osseous augmentation in genioplasty procedure: A comparison.

National journal of maxillofacial surgery 2010 Vol.1(1) p. 1-5

Mohammad S, Dwivedi CD, Singh RK, Singh V, Pal US

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Genioplasty deals with small area of craniofacial complex, namely, chin. Alloplastic chin implants and sliding genioplasty represent the two currently accepted methods of chin augmentation. Chin augmentation with medpore has become popular in the recent years.

[MATERIAL AND METHODS] The study comprised 16 patients having retruded chin, out of whom 8 patients underwent sliding genioplasty while the other 8 underwent chin augmentation using medpore. The versatility and benefits of the two techniques are discussed.

[RESULT AND CONCLUSION] All the patients achieved satisfactory results with no complication. Both the techniques can be used for mild to moderate retrogenia, while in the case of severe retrogenia, sliding genioplasty is recommended. Medpore is especially used for revision of chin shape. Medpore can give the same satisfactory result as osseous genioplasty in cases of mild to moderate horizontal chin deficiency. All the patients from both the groups showed significant improvement in facial profile and high degree of satisfaction resulting in improved self-esteem.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 genioplasty 턱끝성형술 dict 3
시술 sliding genioplasty 턱끝성형술 dict 3
시술 chin augmentation 턱끝성형술 dict 3
해부 chin scispacy 1
해부 medpore scispacy 1
합병증 chin scispacy 1
합병증 retruded chin scispacy 1
합병증 medpore scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Genioplasty scispacy 1
약물 [MATERIAL AND scispacy 1
질환 horizontal chin deficiency scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 osseous genioplasty scispacy 1

📑 인용 관계

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문