Streamlined Facial Rejuvenation: A Randomized Split-Face Trial of Premixed Intradermal Botulinum Toxin Type A and Hyaluronic Acid Biorevitalization.

Aesthetic surgery journal 2026 Vol.46(5) p. NP16-NP23

Alzayadneh I, Hamdan O, Alzayadneh L, Alhuneafat L, Abualhaj S, Al-Musaileem N, Doubi AO, Albassomi A, Rival R, Solomon P

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) effectively treats dynamic wrinkles but offers limited direct improvement in skin quality. Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based biorevitalization enhances hydration, firmness, and radiance; however, high-quality trials evaluating their combined use under controlled conditions are scarce.

[OBJECTIVES] To compare the efficacy and safety of a single-session, premixed intradermal BoNT-A with HA biorevitalization (NCTF 135HA) vs BoNT-A alone for facial rejuvenation.

[METHODS] In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-face trial, 52 participants (73.1% female; mean age 44.5 ± 4.7 years) received BoNT-A + NCTF 135HA on one facial side and BoNT-A alone contralaterally. Outcomes at Day 60 included Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), visual analog scales for hydration, firmness, radiance, and tone homogeneity, and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores from blinded evaluators and patients. Patient satisfaction and safety were also assessed.

[RESULTS] Mean WSRS reduction was greater with the combination (Δ = 2.33 ± 0.70) vs BoNT-A alone (Δ = 1.34 ± 0.59; d = 1.35, P < .001). Hydration increased significantly only on the combination side (Δ = 3.71 ± 1.48; d = 2.35, P < .001), with larger gains also in firmness (d = 2.11), tone homogeneity (d = 1.51), and radiance (d = 1.16; all P < .001). GAIS scores favored the combination (patients: 2.21 ± 0.67 vs 0.81 ± 0.79; evaluators: 2.02 ± 0.73 vs 0.54 ± 0.69; P < .001). At Day 60, 86.5% noticed a side-to-side difference, 94.2% would repeat, and 94.2% would recommend the combination; comfort was rated tolerable by 67.3%. Adverse events were mild and transient (pinpoint bruising 78.8%, tightness 11.5%, swelling/erythema 13.5%).

[CONCLUSIONS] Premixed intradermal BoNT-A with NCTF 135HA achieved superior wrinkle reduction, enhanced skin quality, and greater patient satisfaction than BoNT-A alone, with minimal downtime and an excellent safety profile.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 facial rejuvenation 안면거상술 dict 2
시술 botulinum toxin 보툴리눔독소 주사 dict 2
재료 hyaluronic acid 히알루론산 dict 2
재료 ha 히알루론산 dict 2
해부 skin scispacy 1
합병증 wrinkles scispacy 1
합병증 facial scispacy 1
합병증 bruising scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Botulinum toxin type A scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVES] scispacy 1
약물 BoNT-A → Botulinum toxin type A scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 WSRS → Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale scispacy 1
질환 bruising C0009938
Contusions
scispacy 1
질환 tightness scispacy 1
질환 NCTF scispacy 1
기타 Split-Face scispacy 1
기타 Botulinum Toxin Type A scispacy 1
기타 BoNT-A → Botulinum toxin type A scispacy 1
기타 female scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 Patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Female; Rejuvenation; Hyaluronic Acid; Skin Aging; Double-Blind Method; Adult; Prospective Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Injections, Intradermal; Patient Satisfaction; Treatment Outcome; Cosmetic Techniques; Dermal Fillers; Face; Neuromuscular Agents

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문