Comparing botulinum toxin and biofeedback therapies for awake bruxism: a randomized clinical trial.

BMC oral health 2025 Vol.25(1) p. 1772

Foscaldo TF, Dos Santos Belo Junior PH, Ribeiro GR, de Proença LS, De la Torre Canales G, Senna PM

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Behavioral therapy using electromyography-based biofeedback (BIO) and botulinum toxin type A (BTA) injections are potential treatments for managing awake bruxism (AB) in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of BIO and BTA in reducing AB behaviors, pain intensity, and psychosocial distress in individuals with TMD.

[METHODS] This single-center, single-blind, parallel-group randomized clinical trial enrolled 40 adults with TMD diagnosed with AB. AB was assessed using the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC) and smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA). Participants presenting an AB frequency of ≥ 60% were randomly allocated to receive BIO or BTA intervention. Pain intensity was measured by the Characteristic Pain Intensity (CPI) score, and psychosocial status was evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-9, PHQ-15) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7). Assessments were conducted at baseline, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U for AB behaviors, Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for within-group comparisons, and the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner post hoc test for between-group comparisons.

[RESULTS] Intra-group comparisons showed a significant reduction in BIO group for sustained teeth contact (BIO: p = 0.004) and EMA-assessed AB global behavior (BIO: p = 0.008). No significant improvements were found in BTA group for the same variables in all follow-ups (p > 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between groups in all follow-ups for OBC and EMA scores (p > 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups for CPI (p = 0.39) or psychosocial outcomes (p > 0.05).

[CONCLUSION] Even though neither intervention improved pain nor psychosocial outcomes, BIO significantly reduced AB behaviors, indicating that BIO may be preferable for controlling AB behaviors in TMD patients.

[TRIAL REGISTRATION] Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC), RBR-62cftbp. Registered on January 9, 2024.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 botulinum toxin 보툴리눔독소 주사 dict 2
해부 temporomandibular scispacy 1
해부 TMD → temporomandibular disorders scispacy 1
해부 Oral scispacy 1
해부 BTA → botulinum toxin type A scispacy 1
해부 teeth scispacy 1
약물 AB behaviors C0004927
Behavior
scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] Intra-group scispacy 1
약물 EMA → Ecological Momentary Assessment scispacy 1
질환 bruxism C0006325
Bruxism
scispacy 1
질환 temporomandibular disorders C0039494
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
scispacy 1
질환 TMD → temporomandibular disorders C0039494
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
scispacy 1
질환 pain C0030193
Pain
scispacy 1
질환 psychosocial distress scispacy 1
질환 Anxiety C0003467
Anxiety
scispacy 1
질환 teeth contact scispacy 1
질환 BTA → botulinum toxin type A scispacy 1
질환 EMA → Ecological Momentary Assessment scispacy 1
기타 botulinum toxin type A scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 BTA → botulinum toxin type A scispacy 1
기타 Patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Bruxism; Female; Male; Adult; Biofeedback, Psychology; Single-Blind Method; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Middle Aged; Electromyography; Pain Measurement; Neuromuscular Agents; Young Adult; Treatment Outcome

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문