Practice patterns in the perioperative treatment of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty: a survey of facial plastic surgeons.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The common practices used in the perioperative care of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty are diverse and controversial. A consensus statement on the preferred clinical pathway in the perioperative treatment of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty has yet to be approached formally. OBJECTIVES To investigate the perioperative treatment of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty and to identify common practice patterns based on the preferences of leading facial plastic surgeons. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We distributed an online survey to members of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Specifically, fellowship directors and academic contact members were anonymously polled and stratified by the number of septorhinoplasties performed annually. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE A cohesive clinical guide to perioperative treatment after rhinoplasty. RESULTS Of the 92 members surveyed, 67 (73%) successfully completed the survey. The distribution of respondents included 43 academicians (64%) and 24 physicians in private practice (36%). Twenty-eight surgeons (42%) performed fewer than 50 rhinoplasties a year and 39 (58%), more than 50, representing 3510 to 4549 septorhinoplasties in total among respondents. Forty-four surgeons (66%) refrained from using any packing, and 41 (61%) used intranasal splints, with polymeric silicone splints the most popular of these (n = 24 [59%]). Sixty-six surgeons (99%) used external nasal splints, including 49 (74%) who used a thermoplastic splint and 49 (74%) who left the external nasal splint in place for 7 days or longer. The most common postoperative interventions to reduce edema and ecchymosis were elevation of the head of bed by 62 (93%), ice packs by 50 (75%), and Arnica montana by 33 (49%). Only 12 surgeons (18%) used postoperative corticosteroids to reduce edema. Fifty-six respondents (84%) prohibited participation in contact sports until at least 6 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Perioperative care and practices after nasal surgery vary among the most highly trained and leading rhinoplasty surgeons. No published communication or consensus on perioperative practices has been disseminated in this setting. Given the results from those surgeons performing the most rhinoplasties in our field, some surgeons may choose to vary their practices to coincide with those of experienced surgeons. These guidelines could facilitate future studies of patient outcomes.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | septorhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 4 | |
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | nasal surgery
|
코성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | facial plastic
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | edema
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | head of
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | silicone splints
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | edema
|
C0013604
Edema
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | ecchymosis
|
C0013491
Ecchymosis
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Female; Health Care Surveys; Humans; Male; Nasal Septum; Needs Assessment; Perioperative Care; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Quality Indicators, Health Care; Rhinoplasty; Surgery, Plastic; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.