Phase I/III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a New Botulinum Toxin (HU-014) Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Crow's Feet Lines.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] HU-014, a newly introduced botulinum toxin type A, has not been investigated for its efficacy and safety in crow's feet line (CFL) treatment.
[OBJECTIVE] Here, we compared the efficacy and safety of HU-014 and onabotulinumtoxinA in CFL treatment.
[METHODS] This was a randomized, double-blind, active drug-controlled, multicenter, 16-week, Phase I/III study designed to determine the noninferiority of HU-014 compared with onabotulinumtoxinA in moderate-to-severe CFL treatment. In the Phase III study, 290 subjects were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single treatment of HU-014 or onabotulinumtoxinA. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving Grade 0 or 1 in the facial wrinkle scale on maximum smile at Week 4.
[RESULTS] The primary endpoint was achieved by 72% of the subjects with HU-014 and onabotulinumtoxinA treatments, supporting the noninferiority of HU-014 compared with onabotulinumtoxinA. All secondary efficacy outcomes were achieved by the subjects. The 2 groups showed no significant differences in the safety analysis.
[CONCLUSION] HU-014 has noninferior efficacy and safety compared with onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of CFL.
[OBJECTIVE] Here, we compared the efficacy and safety of HU-014 and onabotulinumtoxinA in CFL treatment.
[METHODS] This was a randomized, double-blind, active drug-controlled, multicenter, 16-week, Phase I/III study designed to determine the noninferiority of HU-014 compared with onabotulinumtoxinA in moderate-to-severe CFL treatment. In the Phase III study, 290 subjects were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single treatment of HU-014 or onabotulinumtoxinA. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving Grade 0 or 1 in the facial wrinkle scale on maximum smile at Week 4.
[RESULTS] The primary endpoint was achieved by 72% of the subjects with HU-014 and onabotulinumtoxinA treatments, supporting the noninferiority of HU-014 compared with onabotulinumtoxinA. All secondary efficacy outcomes were achieved by the subjects. The 2 groups showed no significant differences in the safety analysis.
[CONCLUSION] HU-014 has noninferior efficacy and safety compared with onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of CFL.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | botulinum toxin
|
보툴리눔독소 주사 | dict | 2 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuromuscular Agents; Patient Satisfaction; Skin Aging; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Local therapeutic strategies for neurocutaneous dysesthesia: from capsaicin to cannabinoids.
- Comparative efficacy of intralesional therapies for keloid scars: a network meta-analysis.
- Adverse neurological events following botulinum toxin type A: A case series of post-injection seizures and paralysis.
- Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A.
- Current Perspectives on Pectoralis Minor Syndrome: A Narrative Review.