Aesthetic Improvement, Facial Harmony, and Patient Satisfaction after Lower Face Treatment with a Hyaluronic Acid Filler: A Randomized Post-Marketing Study to Evaluate Two Different Stepwise Injection Approaches.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] The authors sought to evaluate a flexible, hyaluronic acid (HA) filler, Restylane® Defyne™ (HA) (Galderma), for combined treatment of chin, nasolabial folds (NLFs), and marionette lines (MLs), in a predefined stepwise order, comparing Down-up (ie, chin first) versus Top-down (NLFs and MLs first) treatment approaches. This postmarketing study complements prior pivotal investigations that demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of HA treatments of the lower face, by providing a standardized treatment algorithm for combining several treatment areas in the lower face.
[METHODS] HA was injected at Day 1 in the first treatment area and at Week 3 in the second area (randomized to either Down-up or Top-down order), with optional touch-up (any area) at Week 6. Assessments included Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), skin firmness, facial harmony, patient satisfaction, and safety until Week 9.
[RESULTS] Both approaches achieved similar, favorable results at Week 9, with 100% of patients in both groups (Down-up, n=31; Top-down, n=29) demonstrating aesthetic improvement on the GAIS, improved skin firmness and facial harmony, and natural-looking results. Of patients seeking aesthetic improvement of the submental area, 95% in the Top-down group and 100% in the Down-up achieved improvement. Patient-reported endpoints supported these results, with high satisfaction throughout the study. HA was well tolerated throughout the study.
[LIMITATIONS] The results should be considered indicative rather than definitive given the post-marketing design of the study.
[CONCLUSION] Both stepwise approaches may be used for administering HA when treating the combined areas of chin, NLFs, and MLs.
[METHODS] HA was injected at Day 1 in the first treatment area and at Week 3 in the second area (randomized to either Down-up or Top-down order), with optional touch-up (any area) at Week 6. Assessments included Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), skin firmness, facial harmony, patient satisfaction, and safety until Week 9.
[RESULTS] Both approaches achieved similar, favorable results at Week 9, with 100% of patients in both groups (Down-up, n=31; Top-down, n=29) demonstrating aesthetic improvement on the GAIS, improved skin firmness and facial harmony, and natural-looking results. Of patients seeking aesthetic improvement of the submental area, 95% in the Top-down group and 100% in the Down-up achieved improvement. Patient-reported endpoints supported these results, with high satisfaction throughout the study. HA was well tolerated throughout the study.
[LIMITATIONS] The results should be considered indicative rather than definitive given the post-marketing design of the study.
[CONCLUSION] Both stepwise approaches may be used for administering HA when treating the combined areas of chin, NLFs, and MLs.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 재료 | ha
|
히알루론산 | dict | 6 | |
| 재료 | hyaluronic acid
|
히알루론산 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | hyaluronic acid filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Choroidal ischemia after self-injection of hyaluronic acid filler.
- Intra-articular therapies for synovial joint dysfunction: a comprehensive integrative review.
- Clinical safety of a low-modification hyaluronic acid filler (MoD 2%) for facial rejuvenation.
- A Fibrous-Porous Microsphere-Based Composite Filler for Synchronized Immediate and Long-Term Soft Tissue Restoration.