Long-term Efficacy and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Dermal Filler With Tri-Hyal Technology to Enhance Lip Volume.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Interventions to enhance lip volume and shape are common aesthetic procedures to counter signs of aging.
[OBJECTIVES] This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Art Filler Lips (AFL), with or without retouching, at restoring lip shape and volume, tolerability, and persistence over 18 months.
[METHODS] During this open-label study, AFL (≤2.0 mL) was injected into the upper, lower, and/or both red lips and borders at baseline (D0). Patients were evaluated at D21, when, if necessary, retouching was performed. Patients were evaluated at D42, D90, D180, D270, D360, D450, and D540. The primary assessment was based on evaluation at D21 using the Medicis Lip Fullness Scale (MLFS). Satisfactory volume restoration was defined as an improvement of ≥1 point vs D0. Secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs), and investigator and patient satisfaction rates based on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scores.
[RESULTS] Among 73 patients (97% females; 54.4 ± 10.5 years), 56% of lips were injected without any retouch. Mean MLFS scores either for upper and lower lips separately or together, significantly improved by D21 for the patients without retouching or D42 for those with (all < .0001). At D21/42, 99% of upper lips, 94% of lower lips, and 96% of both lips showed satisfactory volume restoration. This proportion declined between D21/42 and D540. The most reported immediate AEs were swelling, sensitivity, and pain and were mild to moderate, lasting for <2 weeks.
[CONCLUSIONS] AFL is well tolerated and produces a sustained objective and subjective lip volume restoration and shape.
[OBJECTIVES] This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Art Filler Lips (AFL), with or without retouching, at restoring lip shape and volume, tolerability, and persistence over 18 months.
[METHODS] During this open-label study, AFL (≤2.0 mL) was injected into the upper, lower, and/or both red lips and borders at baseline (D0). Patients were evaluated at D21, when, if necessary, retouching was performed. Patients were evaluated at D42, D90, D180, D270, D360, D450, and D540. The primary assessment was based on evaluation at D21 using the Medicis Lip Fullness Scale (MLFS). Satisfactory volume restoration was defined as an improvement of ≥1 point vs D0. Secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs), and investigator and patient satisfaction rates based on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scores.
[RESULTS] Among 73 patients (97% females; 54.4 ± 10.5 years), 56% of lips were injected without any retouch. Mean MLFS scores either for upper and lower lips separately or together, significantly improved by D21 for the patients without retouching or D42 for those with (all < .0001). At D21/42, 99% of upper lips, 94% of lower lips, and 96% of both lips showed satisfactory volume restoration. This proportion declined between D21/42 and D540. The most reported immediate AEs were swelling, sensitivity, and pain and were mild to moderate, lasting for <2 weeks.
[CONCLUSIONS] AFL is well tolerated and produces a sustained objective and subjective lip volume restoration and shape.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | dermal filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 | |
| 재료 | hyaluronic acid
|
히알루론산 | dict | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Choroidal ischemia after self-injection of hyaluronic acid filler.
- Intra-articular therapies for synovial joint dysfunction: a comprehensive integrative review.
- Clinical safety of a low-modification hyaluronic acid filler (MoD 2%) for facial rejuvenation.
- A Fibrous-Porous Microsphere-Based Composite Filler for Synchronized Immediate and Long-Term Soft Tissue Restoration.