Long-term duration and safety of Radiesse (+) for the treatment of jawline.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA)-carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)+ has unique properties that make it optimal for lifting, contouring, and defining the jawline. This long-term follow-up of a randomized, multicenter, rater-blinded trial reports efficacy and safety of CaHA-CMC(+) through 48 and up to 60 weeks post-treatment.
[METHODS] Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to the treatment or the control/delayed treatment group to receive CaHA-CMC(+) injections in both jawlines. While touch-ups were permitted 4 weeks post-treatment for both groups, only the treatment group was eligible for optional retreatment after 48 weeks. The primary outcome was ≥1-point improvement on both jawlines on the Merz Jawline Assessment Scale (MJAS); secondary endpoints included the Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) among others. Post hoc analysis included pooling up to 48-week data from the combined treatment and control/delayed groups and 60-week data for the treatment group.
[RESULTS] Overall, 175 received treatment. MJAS responder rates were 77.9%, 78.7%, and 62.9% at 12, 24, and 48 weeks post-treatment, respectively. Responder rate on the MJAS at 60 weeks was 74.6% for those who received retreatment and 43.5% for those patients who received only the initial and touchup treatments. SGAIS scores demonstrated 93.4%, 85.6%, and 68.5% of patients rated themselves very much improved after 12, 24, and 48 weeks, respectively. Adverse events consisted of procedure or CaHA-CMC(+)-related events that were mostly resolved and overwhelmingly mild.
[CONCLUSIONS] CaHA-CMC(+) produced clinically meaningful and long-lasting improvements in jawline contour and was well tolerated in patients through 60 weeks.
[TRIAL REGISTRATION] ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03583359.
[METHODS] Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to the treatment or the control/delayed treatment group to receive CaHA-CMC(+) injections in both jawlines. While touch-ups were permitted 4 weeks post-treatment for both groups, only the treatment group was eligible for optional retreatment after 48 weeks. The primary outcome was ≥1-point improvement on both jawlines on the Merz Jawline Assessment Scale (MJAS); secondary endpoints included the Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) among others. Post hoc analysis included pooling up to 48-week data from the combined treatment and control/delayed groups and 60-week data for the treatment group.
[RESULTS] Overall, 175 received treatment. MJAS responder rates were 77.9%, 78.7%, and 62.9% at 12, 24, and 48 weeks post-treatment, respectively. Responder rate on the MJAS at 60 weeks was 74.6% for those who received retreatment and 43.5% for those patients who received only the initial and touchup treatments. SGAIS scores demonstrated 93.4%, 85.6%, and 68.5% of patients rated themselves very much improved after 12, 24, and 48 weeks, respectively. Adverse events consisted of procedure or CaHA-CMC(+)-related events that were mostly resolved and overwhelmingly mild.
[CONCLUSIONS] CaHA-CMC(+) produced clinically meaningful and long-lasting improvements in jawline contour and was well tolerated in patients through 60 weeks.
[TRIAL REGISTRATION] ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03583359.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 재료 | caha
|
칼슘하이드록시아파타이트 | dict | 5 | |
| 재료 | radiesse
|
칼슘하이드록시아파타이트 | dict | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Adult; Durapatite; Male; Cosmetic Techniques; Follow-Up Studies; Skin Aging; Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium; Treatment Outcome; Time Factors; Dermal Fillers; Single-Blind Method; Esthetics; Patient Satisfaction; Face; Aged
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Assessment of the Possible Impacts of Collagen Biostimulators on Surgical Facelift.
- Aesthetic Medicine in Oncology: A Systematic Review of Botulinum Toxin, Dermal Fillers, Chemical Peels, and Laser Therapies in Cancer Patient.
- Ultrasonographic evaluation of cosmetic fillers: patterns and frequent complications - A literature review.
- Surgical vs Non-surgical Chin Augmentation: A Systematic Review of Techniques Satisfaction, and Complications.
- Injectables and Facelifts: Can We Coexist? A Retrospective Chart Review Assessing Injectable Treatments Preceding and Following Rhytidectomy.