Cytocompatibility Analysis and Comparison of Different Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Minimally Invasive Esthetics.

[BACKGROUND/AIM] To overcome the natural visual consequences of the physiological aging process, the use of biodegradable fillers made of hyaluronic acid or sodium carboxymethyl cellulose is increasingly popular in modern esthetic medicine. Clinicians can choose from a wide range of fillers with variable compositions and rheological properties, and therefore with different application areas and injection depths. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the most commonly used fillers for facial augmentation regarding their in vitro biocompatibility and to find potential correlations to their rheological properties.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] In the present study, direct and indirect in vitro cytotoxicity analysis according to DIN EN ISO 10993-5 were performed on 39 different filler materials for facial augmentation.

[RESULTS] All fillers analyzed in this study overall showed satisfactory results in the direct and indirect cytocompatibility tests. While no material was outside the threshold values in the 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulphenyl)-(2H)-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) cell viability and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) cell proliferation assays or in the live-dead staining, only 7 out of the 39 fillers reached the required values in the lactate dehydrogenase assay.

[CONCLUSION] All biodegradable fillers examined in this study were found to be sufficiently cytocompatible. Although the qualitative analysis of the test results showed differences between the fillers, no concrete correlation between test performance and composition or manufacturer of the fillers was found. Future efforts are required to provide clinicians with even better support in choosing the right filler for optimal outcome and patient satisfaction.