Iatrogenic Amputation of the Distal Third of the Penis During Circumcision: Successful Reimplantation Without Magnification.

Case reports in urology 2026 Vol.2026() p. 5856486

Sawadogo H, Yaméogo CAMKD, Paré AK, Ouattara AK, Ouédraogo F, Gnanou H, Kirakoya B, Ouattara A

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Traumatic penile amputations, although rare, represent complex urological emergencies. Cases of iatrogenic origin secondary to circumcision are an exceptionally uncommon but serious etiology. The standard of treatment is microsurgery. However, in many contexts, particularly in developing countries, access to microsurgery is limited, leading surgical teams to resort to reimplantation techniques without microvascular anastomosis, with variable results.

[CASE PRESENTATION] An 8-year-old boy was admitted to our department for complete amputation of the distal third of the penis during a circumcision. The amputated segment was preserved in saline solution. Emergency reimplantation was performed within a 3-h timeframe. The procedure included end-to-end urethrorrhaphy over a stent, cavernorrhaphy, and vascular alignment, all without the use of loupes or an operating microscope. The patient was discharged on the 25th postoperative day with a perfectly viable reimplanted segment and a satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcome.

[CONCLUSIONS] This case demonstrates that penile reimplantation can be successful in the absence of microsurgery in children, through meticulous technique and aggressive postoperative management of edema in settings with limited technological resources. It also serves as an urgent reminder of the absolute necessity to prevent these tragic accidents through the standardization and medicalization of circumcision practices. Long-term follow-up is essential to assess the erectile and voiding function of this patient.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 microsurgery 미세수술 dict 3
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 1

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문