Rehabilitation Outcome of Implants Placed in Free Fibula Flap Versus Iliac Crest Free Flap? A Systematic Review.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVES] To assess the successful rehabilitation outcome of dental implants placed in free fibula flap and iliac crest free flap after maxillary or mandibular resection.
[MATERIAL AND METHOD] This systematic review was done using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review guidelines published from 2000 to February 2023. Sixteen publications consisting of rehabilitation outcome of dental implants placed in free fibula or iliac crest free flap after surgical resection were included in our analysis.
[RESULTS] The mean age of the included participants was 51 years. A total of 643 individuals were included. A total of 927 implants were placed in free fibula flap and 230 implants were placed in iliac crest free flap in the studies included in our review. The success rate of implants ranged between 92 and 100% in accordance to Albrektsson criteria. The follow-up ranged between 1 and 15 year. Bias due to selection showed some concern between 80 and 100%. Bias in the classification of intervention was seen in 90-100%. The overall weight was low showing 100% low bias.
[CONCLUSION] The present systematic review found no significant differences in implant survival rates between the free fibula flap and the iliac crest free flap. As such, clinical decisions for the use of implants should be made based on patient and deficit factors.
[MATERIAL AND METHOD] This systematic review was done using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review guidelines published from 2000 to February 2023. Sixteen publications consisting of rehabilitation outcome of dental implants placed in free fibula or iliac crest free flap after surgical resection were included in our analysis.
[RESULTS] The mean age of the included participants was 51 years. A total of 643 individuals were included. A total of 927 implants were placed in free fibula flap and 230 implants were placed in iliac crest free flap in the studies included in our review. The success rate of implants ranged between 92 and 100% in accordance to Albrektsson criteria. The follow-up ranged between 1 and 15 year. Bias due to selection showed some concern between 80 and 100%. Bias in the classification of intervention was seen in 90-100%. The overall weight was low showing 100% low bias.
[CONCLUSION] The present systematic review found no significant differences in implant survival rates between the free fibula flap and the iliac crest free flap. As such, clinical decisions for the use of implants should be made based on patient and deficit factors.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | free flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 5 | |
| 시술 | flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 4 |
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.
- Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.