Outcomes of Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction With One Versus Two Primary Surgeons.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery 2025 Vol.50(6) p. 981-986

Macke J, Sawaf T, Schelbar N, Renslo B, Schopper H, Sykes KJ, Bur A, Bond J, Shnayder Y, Tsue TT, Girod D, Kakarala K

관련 도메인

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate operative efficiency and quality in head and neck free flap reconstruction with one versus two primary surgeons by comparing procedure duration, hospital length of stay, complications and readmission rates.

[STUDY DESIGN] Retrospective chart review.

[SETTING] Single-institution tertiary care centre.

[METHODS] A total of 583 patients who received head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction at the University of Kansas Medical Center between November 2010 and January 2021 were stratified into two cohorts: one-surgeon cohort and two-surgeon cohort. In the two-surgeon cohort, one surgeon performed tissue resection and the second performed reconstruction (n = 329), whereas one primary surgeon performed both resection and reconstruction in the one-surgeon cohort (n = 254). Patient age, sex, American Society of Anaesthesia (ASA) status and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) at time of surgery were collected.

[RESULTS] No significant difference in baseline clinicodemographic characteristics was found between groups. A reduced mean procedure duration was found in the one-surgeon cohort (424.9 min, SD 127.6) compared to the two-surgeon cohort (552.4 min, SD 119.2) (mean difference 127.5 min, Cohen d = 1.04). A slightly greater proportion of osteocutaneous free flaps was performed in the two-surgeon cohort compared to the one-surgeon cohort (one-surgeon: 53.5%; two-surgeon 62.3%). All other secondary quality measures showed nonsignificant differences with the exception of the proportion requiring intraoperative pressors (86.2% in one-surgeon cohort vs. 74.5% in two-surgeon cohort, mean difference 11.7%, Cohen d = 0.29).

[CONCLUSIONS] This study demonstrates at least noninferior efficiency and quality outcomes in free flap cases led by single primary surgeons at our institution. The optimal approach to maximise operative efficiency and quality likely differs across surgeons and centres.

[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] III.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 free flap 피판재건술 dict 4
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 1
해부 Flap scispacy 1
해부 tissue scispacy 1
합병증 osteocutaneous free flaps scispacy 1
약물 ASA → Anaesthesia C0002903
Anesthesia procedures
scispacy 1
약물 noninferior scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVE] scispacy 1
약물 pressors scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 head and neck surgery C1512343
Head and Neck Surgery
scispacy 1
질환 comorbidity C0009488
Comorbidity
scispacy 1
질환 head and neck free flap scispacy 1
질환 head and neck scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 Patient scispacy 1
기타 SD 127.6 scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Free Tissue Flaps; Male; Female; Retrospective Studies; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Middle Aged; Aged; Length of Stay; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; Adult; Patient Readmission; Microsurgery

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문