A systematic review of wide alveolar cleft repair techniques.
Abstract
Wide alveolar clefts impair secondary alveolar bone grafting due to deficient mucoperiosteal tissue for grafted bone coverage. Consequently, preparatory or alternative techniques are often required for closure of such defects. We conducted a PRISMA-adherent systematic literature review on wide alveolar cleft repair to compare treatment efficacies and patient populations. With this information, we provide guidance on the relative advantages and disadvantages of each examined method. Forty-two studies published from 1987-2022 were included, containing 332 patients treated with distraction osteogenesis (52.1%), orthognathic surgery (33.1%), local flap (8.1%), or free flap (6.6%) repair. There were no significant differences in patient ages between distraction osteogenesis device types (p = 0.401, Kruskal-Wallis) or treatment intervals, except that tooth-borne consolidation was significantly faster than bone-borne consolidation (p < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Tukey honestly significant difference test). Orthognathic surgery and free flap patients were more likely to have prior failed cleft reconstructions than those who underwent distraction osteogenesis or local flap repair (p < 0.05, chi-square test of independence), suggesting a "second-line" designation to orthognathic surgery and free flap repair. Orthognathic surgery also had significantly higher osseous closure rates than other treatments (p < 0.0125, chi-square test with Bonferroni correction). Younger patients more often received orthognathic surgery or distraction osteogenesis whereas older patients received free or local flaps (p < 0.05, Welch's one-directional ANOVA with Games-Howell test). Each of the techniques evaluated have unique features regarding patient age, recovery duration/complexity preferences, and treatment history. Although the ideal treatment may differ between patients, orthognathic surgery and free flaps appear to be the most effective techniques for wide alveolar cleft repair.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | orthognathic surgery
|
안면윤곽술 | dict | 6 | |
| 시술 | free flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 3 | |
| 시술 | local flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | alveolar
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | mucoperiosteal tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | bone
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | flap
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | flap
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | alveolar cleft repair
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | duration/complexity
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | alveolar cleft
|
C0432084
Cleft of primary palate
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | alveolar clefts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | alveolar bone
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | tooth-borne
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Osteogenesis, Distraction; Cleft Palate; Surgical Flaps; Alveolar Bone Grafting; Orthognathic Surgical Procedures; Alveolar Process
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.
- Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.