A systematic review of wide alveolar cleft repair techniques.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2025 Vol.102() p. 335-347

Mordukhovich I, Hill M, Fragomen FR, Meyers A, Gharb BB, Rampazzo A

관련 도메인

Abstract

Wide alveolar clefts impair secondary alveolar bone grafting due to deficient mucoperiosteal tissue for grafted bone coverage. Consequently, preparatory or alternative techniques are often required for closure of such defects. We conducted a PRISMA-adherent systematic literature review on wide alveolar cleft repair to compare treatment efficacies and patient populations. With this information, we provide guidance on the relative advantages and disadvantages of each examined method. Forty-two studies published from 1987-2022 were included, containing 332 patients treated with distraction osteogenesis (52.1%), orthognathic surgery (33.1%), local flap (8.1%), or free flap (6.6%) repair. There were no significant differences in patient ages between distraction osteogenesis device types (p = 0.401, Kruskal-Wallis) or treatment intervals, except that tooth-borne consolidation was significantly faster than bone-borne consolidation (p < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Tukey honestly significant difference test). Orthognathic surgery and free flap patients were more likely to have prior failed cleft reconstructions than those who underwent distraction osteogenesis or local flap repair (p < 0.05, chi-square test of independence), suggesting a "second-line" designation to orthognathic surgery and free flap repair. Orthognathic surgery also had significantly higher osseous closure rates than other treatments (p < 0.0125, chi-square test with Bonferroni correction). Younger patients more often received orthognathic surgery or distraction osteogenesis whereas older patients received free or local flaps (p < 0.05, Welch's one-directional ANOVA with Games-Howell test). Each of the techniques evaluated have unique features regarding patient age, recovery duration/complexity preferences, and treatment history. Although the ideal treatment may differ between patients, orthognathic surgery and free flaps appear to be the most effective techniques for wide alveolar cleft repair.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 orthognathic surgery 안면윤곽술 dict 6
시술 free flap 피판재건술 dict 3
시술 local flap 피판재건술 dict 2
해부 alveolar scispacy 1
해부 mucoperiosteal tissue scispacy 1
해부 bone scispacy 1
해부 flap scispacy 1
합병증 flap scispacy 1
질환 alveolar cleft repair scispacy 1
질환 duration/complexity scispacy 1
질환 alveolar cleft C0432084
Cleft of primary palate
scispacy 1
기타 alveolar clefts scispacy 1
기타 alveolar bone scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 tooth-borne scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Osteogenesis, Distraction; Cleft Palate; Surgical Flaps; Alveolar Bone Grafting; Orthognathic Surgical Procedures; Alveolar Process

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문