Microvascular reconstruction in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a Europe-wide data collection.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery 2025 Vol.29(1) p. 42

Becker P, Zeller AN, Goetze E, Puladi B, Hölzle F, Hoffmann J, Raguse JD, Wermker K, Pabst A

관련 도메인

Abstract

[PURPOSE] This study aims to analyze microvascular reconstruction in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) in Europe.

[METHODS] Based on previous studies, a dynamic online questionnaire was developed and subjected to internal and external evaluation. The questionnaire comprised multiple-choice, rating, and open-ended questions, addressing general and specific aspects and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on microvascular reconstruction in OMFS in Europe. It was implemented into SurveyMonkey's online survey software and emailed to OMFS departments registered with the European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (EACMFS).

[RESULTS] Seventy-five participants from 23 European countries participated. Among them, 89% perform between 1 and 70 microvascular free flaps (MFF) annually. 38% of the participants reported a reduction in MFF due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The radial forearm (41% of participants) and fibula free flap (31%) are the most reported MFF. In most cases (59%), MFF procedures are exclusively performed by OMFS for OMFS patients, while 43% of participants reported cooperations with plastic surgeons to perform MFF for OMFS patients. Many participants prefer arterial end-to-end anastomoses (54%) using the facial artery (54%) and, if available, two venous anastomoses (68%). Low molecular weight heparin is the most used postoperative anticoagulant, reported by 67% of participants. For flap monitoring, clinical assessment and Doppler ultrasound are preferred by most participants (95% and 78%, respectively). Many participants (66%) indicated that tracheotomy is only performed when necessary. Differences were observed in relation to CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing) techniques, types of osteosynthesis, and dental implant treatment.

[CONCLUSION] This study highlighted variability in microvascular reconstruction in OMFS in Europe. Further studies are needed to assess these aspects in detail.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 5
시술 free flap 피판재건술 dict 1
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 1
해부 oral scispacy 1
해부 maxillofacial scispacy 1
해부 fibula scispacy 1
합병증 MFF → microvascular free flaps scispacy 1
약물 heparin C0019134
heparin
scispacy 1
약물 COVID-19 scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] scispacy 1
질환 MFF → microvascular free flaps scispacy 1
기타 participants scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 arterial scispacy 1
기타 venous scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Europe; COVID-19; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Free Tissue Flaps; Surveys and Questionnaires; Oral Surgical Procedures; Microsurgery; Surgery, Oral; Pandemics; Male

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문