Dural arteriovenous fistulas at the craniocervical junction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neurosurgical review 2024 Vol.47(1) p. 812

Qedair J, Sankarappan K, Mirahmadi Eraghi M, Gersey ZC, Agarwal P, Anand SK, Palmisciano P, Blackwell M, Maroufi SF, Aoun SG, El Ahmadieh TY, Cohen-Gadol AA, Bin-Alamer O

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The management for craniocervical junction dural arteriovenous fistulas (CCJ-DAVFs) remains controversial and clinically challenging. We systemically summarized the clinical and angiographic outcomes of microsurgery, embolization, and conservative management.

[METHODS] Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, following PRISMA guidelines. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the clinical characteristics, management approaches, and clinical and angiographic outcomes.

[RESULTS] We included 13 articles (166 patients). The weighted mean age was 58.9 years (95%CI: 53.2-64.5), 58.8 years (95%CI: 48.4-69.2), and 63.8 years (95%CI: 60.1-67.5), in microsurgery, embolization, and conservative groups respectively, with an overall male sex predominance (microsurgery [n = 51/77, 66.2%], embolization [n = 44/56, 78.6%], and conservative management [n = 6/8, 75.0%]). Patients were managed with microsurgery (n = 80/172, 46.5%), embolization (n = 79/172, 45.9%), and conservative treatment (n = 13/172, 7.6%). Foramen magnum was the most common location (microsurgery [n = 34/77, 44.2%], embolization [n = 31/56, 55.4%], and conservative treatment [n = 3/8, 37.5%]). Vertebral artery was the primary feeder (microsurgery [n = 58/84, 69.1%], embolization [n = 41/86, 47.6%], and conservative treatment [n = 4/7, 57.1%]). Complete fistula obliteration rates were 74.1% (95%CI:52.3-88.2%) in the microsurgery group and 54.9% (95%CI:30.7-77.0%) in the embolization group. Complications rates were 16.2% (95%CI:6.7-34.5%) in the embolization group, 11.6% (95%CI:3.8-30.4%) in the microsurgery group, and 7.7% (95%CI:1.1-39.1%) in the conservative group. Different rates of good clinical outcomes were observed [microsurgery: 66.4% (95%CI:48.1-80.8%), embolization: 51.9% (95%CI:30.8-72.4%), and conservative: 11.6% (95%CI:4.4-27.4%)].

[CONCLUSIONS] In patients with CCJ-DAVFs, each management approach has its own merits based on the fistula and patient characteristics.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 microsurgery 미세수술 dict 9
해부 feeder scispacy 1
합병증 craniocervical scispacy 1
합병증 craniocervical junction scispacy 1
합병증 95%CI:30.8 scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] In scispacy 1
질환 Dural arteriovenous fistulas C0752156
Dural Arteriovenous Fistula
scispacy 1
질환 craniocervical junction dural arteriovenous fistulas scispacy 1
질환 fistula C0016169
pathologic fistula
scispacy 1
질환 CCJ-DAVFs → craniocervical junction dural arteriovenous fistulas scispacy 1
기타 Dural arteriovenous scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1
기타 79/172 scispacy 1
기타 3/8 scispacy 1
기타 artery scispacy 1
기타 58/84 scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations; Embolization, Therapeutic; Microsurgery; Treatment Outcome

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문