DIEP Flap versus PAP Flap versus LAP Flap: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Aesthetic Outcomes, Complications, and Satisfaction.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2024 Vol.154(4S) p. 41S-51S

Haddock NT, Lakatta AC, Steppe C, Teotia SS

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] As free breast reconstruction options evolve, a patient- and body-centric approach can distinguish refined aesthetic outcomes. Although deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), profunda artery perforator (PAP), and lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flaps are all safe and effective options for breast reconstruction, a head-to-head analysis of these 3 flaps has not been performed. The authors aim to compare these 3 flaps based on outcomes, BREAST-Q scores, and aesthetic results.

[METHODS] After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review in a Research Electronic Data Capture database-guided analysis was conducted of patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral DIEP, PAP, or LAP flaps at a single academic institution. Propensity matching was performed to match 50 patients (100 flaps) in each group. Postoperative complications and BREAST-Q satisfaction survey scores were documented, and crowdsourcing was carried out to determine aesthetic preference in the general population.

[RESULTS] Overall patient postoperative breast satisfaction was insignificantly different across the 3 flap groups ( P > 0.05). Associations were seen with LAP flap donor-site seromas, PAP flap donor-site infections and wounds, and DIEP flap breast wounds and flap necrosis ( P < 0.05). DIEP flaps had a higher raw score average on crowdsourcing survey, although LAP flaps were rated significantly higher aesthetically than DIEP and PAP flaps when undergoing a matched head-to-head analysis ( P < 0.05).

[CONCLUSIONS] DIEP, PAP, and LAP flaps all have favorable outcomes with insignificantly different long-term satisfaction, with comparable complication profiles. Although DIEP flaps may initially score higher, LAP flaps score higher frequently when analyzed in a head-to-head analysis. For these reasons, tailoring breast reconstruction to the patient's anatomy and morphology provides optimal outcomes.

[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, III.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 7
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 6
시술 diep flap 피판재건술 dict 2
해부 profunda artery perforator (PAP) scispacy 1
합병증 seromas scispacy 1
합병증 wounds scispacy 1
합병증 flap necrosis 괴사 dict 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] DIEP scispacy 1
질환 DIEP → deep inferior epigastric perforator scispacy 1
질환 seromas C0262627
Seroma
scispacy 1
질환 infections C0851162
Infections of musculoskeletal system
scispacy 1
질환 necrosis C0027540
Necrosis
scispacy 1
질환 breast wounds scispacy 1
기타 PAP → profunda artery perforator scispacy 1
기타 LAP → lumbar artery perforator scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 bilateral DIEP scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 DIEP flaps scispacy 1
기타 DIEP → deep inferior epigastric perforator scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Perforator Flap; Mammaplasty; Retrospective Studies; Patient Satisfaction; Middle Aged; Esthetics; Propensity Score; Postoperative Complications; Adult; Epigastric Arteries; Breast Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome

📑 인용 관계

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문