Simultaneous Co-surgeon Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap Breast Reconstructions: Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes.

Annals of surgical oncology 2024 Vol.31(8) p. 5409-5416

Wang CS, Al-Nowaylati AR, Matusko N, Momoh AO, Kung TA

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] A co-surgeon model is known to be favorable in microvascular breast reconstruction, but simultaneous co-surgeon deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap cases have not been well-studied. The authors hypothesize that performing two simultaneous co-surgeon bilateral DIEP flap reconstructions results in non-inferior clinical outcomes and may improve patient access to care.

[METHODS] A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing record review to identify all cases of co-surgeon free-flap breast reconstructions over a 38-month period. Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions with the same two co-surgeons were identified. The control group consisted of subjects who underwent non-simultaneous reconstruction by the same co-surgeons within the same, preceding, or following month of those in the study group. Primary outcome variables were 90-day postoperative complications, while secondary outcomes were operating time, ischemia time, and length of stay. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed.

[RESULTS] Overall, 137 subjects were identified and 64 met the inclusion criteria (n = 28 study, n = 36 control). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in body mass index, radiation, trainee experience, flap perforator number, immediate/delayed reconstruction, or length of stay. There were also no statistically significant differences in complications, including flap loss, anastomosis revision, take-back to the operating room, or re-admission. Operative time was longer in the simultaneous DIEP group (540.5 vs. 443.5 min, p < 0.01), but ischemia time was shorter in the simultaneous group (64.0 vs. 80.5 min, p < 0.01).

[CONCLUSIONS] A simultaneous co-surgeon approach to bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction may improve access to care and does not result in a higher complication rate compared with non-simultaneous bilateral DIEP flaps.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 5
해부 breast 유방 dict 4
시술 diep flap 피판재건술 dict 3
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 1
해부 immediate/delayed scispacy 1
해부 DIEP → Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator scispacy 1
합병증 microvascular breast scispacy 1
합병증 flap perforator scispacy 1
약물 90-day scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] A scispacy 1
약물 co-surgeons scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] A scispacy 1
질환 DIEP flap breast reconstructions scispacy 1
질환 ischemia C0022116
Ischemia
scispacy 1
질환 DIEP → Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1
기타 bilateral DIEP flap scispacy 1
기타 subjects scispacy 1
기타 bilateral DIEP flaps scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Mammaplasty; Perforator Flap; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Epigastric Arteries; Feasibility Studies; Postoperative Complications; Follow-Up Studies; Operative Time; Length of Stay; Prognosis; Surgeons; Adult; Case-Control Studies

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문