Donor Site Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Maxillofacial Reconstruction Using Free Fibula Flap Versus Deep Circumflex Artery Flap-A Systematic Review.

Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery 2024 Vol.23(3) p. 597-607

Tidke SS, Waknis PP, Setiya S, Jain KM, Gupta D, Sakhariya S

관련 도메인

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] A systematic review of the literature on the donor site morbidity in patients undergoing Maxillofacial reconstruction was performed. The two widely used flaps namely free fibula flap (FFF) and DCIA flap were compared to answer the following questions: (1) Is donor site morbidity significantly different in patients undergoing maxillofacial reconstruction with FFF and DCIA flap? (2) Should donor site morbidity be considered as the criteria for choosing the flap for reconstruction.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] The search strategy was based on PRISMA guidelines. Various electronic databases were searched. On reviewing the seven articles included in our systematic review, we found out oral squamous cell carcinoma to be the most common pathology leading to the defects in head and neck region requiring reconstruction with free flaps.

[RESULTS] A total of 531 participants were investigated who underwent maxillofacial reconstruction using FFF and DCIA flap. The study included both the genders. The participants were assessed for short- and long-term donor site morbidity after the microvascular surgery. Mean age is 45-60 years. Three out of seven studies showed DCIA to have lesser complications at donor site than fibula group. While other two studies proved FFF to be better than DCIA. One study proved low donor site morbidity with regard to both the flap.

[CONCLUSION] The free fibula being the flap of choice in head and neck reconstruction has a comparable donor site morbidity to DCIA. The advantages of the iliac artery flap include natural curvature, abundant vertical and horizontal bone height for bone contouring and osseointegration, hidden scar, low incidence of wound healing problems and minimal effect on function and quality of life at long-term follow-up. Thus, it makes it the free flap of choice that one cannot avoid. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021268949).

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 10
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 1
시술 free flap 피판재건술 dict 1
해부 Maxillofacial scispacy 1
해부 fibula scispacy 1
해부 bone scispacy 1
합병증 Donor Site scispacy 1
합병증 flaps scispacy 1
합병증 maxillofacial scispacy 1
합병증 wound scispacy 1
약물 FFF → free fibula flap C5395228
Free fibular flap
scispacy 1
약물 [INTRODUCTION] A scispacy 1
약물 DCIA flap? scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
질환 squamous cell carcinoma C0007137
Squamous cell carcinoma
scispacy 1
질환 head and neck region scispacy 1
질환 oral squamous cell carcinoma scispacy 1
질환 head and neck scispacy 1
질환 CRD42021268949 scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1
기타 Fibula Flap scispacy 1
기타 Circumflex Artery scispacy 1
기타 participants scispacy 1
기타 iliac artery scispacy 1

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문