Tumor Bed Margins Versus Specimen Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: Too Close to Call?

Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale 2024 Vol.53() p. 19160216241278653

Villemure-Poliquin N, Roy ÈM, Nguyen S, Beauchemin M, Audet N

관련 도메인

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] The routine assessment of intraoperative margins has long been the standard of care for oral cavity cancers. However, there is a controversy surrounding the best method for sampling surgical margins. The aim of our study is to determine the precision of a new technique for sampling tumor bed margins (TBMs), to evaluate the impact on survival and the rate of free flap reconstructions.

[METHODS] This retrospective cohort study involved 156 patients with primary cancer of the tongue or floor of the mouth who underwent surgery as initial curative treatment. Patients were separated into 2 groups: one using an oriented TBM derived from Mohs' technique, where the margins are taken from the tumor bed and identified with Vicryl sutures on both the specimen and the tumor bed, and the other using a specimen margins (SMs) driven technique, where the margins are taken from the specimen after the initial resection. Clinicopathologic features, including margin status, were compared for both groups and correlated with locoregional control. Precision of per-operative TBM sampling method was obtained.

[RESULTS] A total of 156 patients were included in the study, of which 80 were in TBM group and 76 were in SM group. Precision analysis showed that the oriented TBM technique pertained a 50% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity, 80% positive predictive value, and an 87.5% negative predictive value. Survival analysis revealed nonstatistically significant differences in both local control (86.88% vs 83.50%;  = .81) as well as local-regional control (82.57% vs 72.32%;  = .21). There was a significant difference in the rate of free flap-surgeries between the 2 groups (30% vs 64.5%;  < .001).

[CONCLUSION] Our described oriented TBM technique has demonstrated reduced risk of free flap reconstructive surgery, increased precision, and similar prognostic in terms of local control, locoregional control, and disease-free survival when compared to the SM method.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 free flap 피판재건술 dict 3
해부 Oral scispacy 1
해부 flap scispacy 1
해부 tongue scispacy 1
해부 mouth scispacy 1
합병증 oral cavity scispacy 1
약물 [INTRODUCTION] The scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
질환 cancers C0006826
Malignant Neoplasms
scispacy 1
질환 primary cancer of the tongue scispacy 1
질환 Tumor Bed Margins scispacy 1
질환 TBM scispacy 1
질환 Mohs' scispacy 1
질환 tumor bed scispacy 1
질환 local-regional scispacy 1
질환 Tumor C0027651
Neoplasms
scispacy 1
질환 Cancer C0006826
Malignant Neoplasms
scispacy 1
기타 tumor bed margins scispacy 1
기타 TBMs → tumor bed margins scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Margins of Excision; Retrospective Studies; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Mouth Neoplasms; Aged; Free Tissue Flaps; Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Mohs Surgery

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문