The Effect of Regional Anaesthesia on Free Flap Survival in Lower Extremity Reconstructions.

[BACKGROUND] The effect of different modalities of anaesthesia in microvascular free flap surgery has been a topic of ongoing debate. Comparative data to study the effect of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia in the form of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) on lower extremity free flap survival is lacking to date. This study aims to elucidate the effect of regional anaesthesia on flap survival in lower extremity free flap reconstructions.

[METHODS] A retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent free vascularised flap reconstruction of the lower extremities between 2012 and 2021 at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), The Netherlands, and between 2019 and 2021 at the Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. In this cohort, we analysed partial and total flap failures.

[RESULTS] In this cohort, 87 patients received a total of 102 microvascular free flap reconstructions of the lower extremity. In 20.5% of these operations, patients received a supplemental PNB. Total flap failure was 23.8% in the regional anaesthesia group compared to 21% in the group with general anaesthesia only ( = 0.779). Operation time was longer for patients with regional anaesthesia ( = 0.057). Length of stay was on average 2 days shorter for patients with supplemental regional anaesthesia ( = 0.716).

[DISCUSSION] This is the largest cohort comparing flap survival in patients receiving general anaesthesia to general anaesthesia with a PNB in lower extremity reconstructions to date. We cannot attribute a significant beneficial or detrimental effect of regional anaesthesia to flap survival. High failure rates stress the need for future studies.

[HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE] Koster ITS, den Os MM, Rutten MVH, . The Effect of Regional Anaesthesia on Free Flap Survival in Lower Extremity Reconstructions. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):15-20.