Chest wall perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: international survey on attitudes and training needs.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Volume replacement using chest wall perforator flaps (CWPFs) is a promising technique to reduce mastectomy rates without sacrificing function or aesthetics. Owing to limited availability of the technique, only a minority of patients currently have access to CWPF procedures.
[METHODS] An international web-based survey was disseminated through social media, dedicated webpages, and national and international societies for breast surgery. The survey explored surgeons' attitudes towards CWPFs and their perceived training needs.
[RESULTS] Of 619 respondents, 88.4 per cent agreed that CWPF surgery was desirable, with one-third offering it and performing a median of 10 (i.q.r. 5-15) procedures annually. They were more likely to be senior (OR 1.35, 95 per cent c.i. 1.18 to 1.55; P < 0.001), with formal oncoplastic training (OR 4.80, 3.09 to 7.48; P < 0.001), and working in larger units (OR 1.18, 1.03 to 1.35; P = 0.018) with a free-flap (OR 1.62, 1.06 to 2.48; P = 0.025) or CWPF (OR 3.02, 1.87 to 4.89; P < 0.001) service available. In cluster and latent class analysis, none showed high cohesion with performance of CWPF surgery.
[CONCLUSION] There is a discrepancy between perceived importance and availability of CWPF surgery, indicating that optimal training is needed.
[METHODS] An international web-based survey was disseminated through social media, dedicated webpages, and national and international societies for breast surgery. The survey explored surgeons' attitudes towards CWPFs and their perceived training needs.
[RESULTS] Of 619 respondents, 88.4 per cent agreed that CWPF surgery was desirable, with one-third offering it and performing a median of 10 (i.q.r. 5-15) procedures annually. They were more likely to be senior (OR 1.35, 95 per cent c.i. 1.18 to 1.55; P < 0.001), with formal oncoplastic training (OR 4.80, 3.09 to 7.48; P < 0.001), and working in larger units (OR 1.18, 1.03 to 1.35; P = 0.018) with a free-flap (OR 1.62, 1.06 to 2.48; P = 0.025) or CWPF (OR 3.02, 1.87 to 4.89; P < 0.001) service available. In cluster and latent class analysis, none showed high cohesion with performance of CWPF surgery.
[CONCLUSION] There is a discrepancy between perceived importance and availability of CWPF surgery, indicating that optimal training is needed.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | CWPF
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Volume
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | wall perforator flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Female; Mastectomy; Perforator Flap; Thoracic Wall; Breast Neoplasms; Mammaplasty; Surveys and Questionnaires; Attitude
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- From Palliation After Angiosarcoma Resection to Totally Autologous Aesthetic Breast Reconstruction Combining Kiss Latissimus Dorsi Flap and Contralateral Breast Sharing Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap: A Case Report.
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.