Implant Placement with Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration in the Anterior Region Close to the Periapical Lesion of Adjacent Teeth: A Combined Treatment Strategy to Prevent Complications.
Abstract
[PURPOSE] To evaluate the safety and performance of a potential novel strategy to resolve the above scenario by simultaneously performing implant-related surgery and endodontic microsurgery (EMS).
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A total of 25 subjects requiring GBR during implant placement in anterior areas were allocated into two groups. In the experimental group (adjacent teeth with periapical lesions) with 10 subjects, implantation and GBR were performed for edentulous areas with simultaneous EMS for adjacent teeth. In the control group (adjacent teeth without periapical lesions) with 15 subjects, implantation and GBR were performed for edentulous areas. The clinical outcomes, radiographic bone remodeling, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed.
[RESULTS] Within a 1-year follow-up, the implant survival rate was 100% in both groups, with no significant difference regarding complications. All teeth achieved complete healing following EMS. Repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) measurements revealed a significant change over time in horizontal bone widths and postoperative patient-reported outcomes, but no intergroup statistically significant differences ( > .05) in horizontal bone widths and visual analog scale scores of pain, swelling, and bleeding were observed. Likewise, the bone volumetric decrease (7.4% ± 4.5% in the experimental group and 7.1% ± 5.2% in the control group) from T1 (suture removal) to T2 (6 months after implantation) revealed no intergroup differences. The horizontal bone width gain at the implant platform was slightly lower in the experimental group ( < .05). Interestingly, the color-coded figures of both groups showed a facial reduction of grafted material in edentulous areas. However, the apical regions following EMS exhibited stable bone remodeling in the experimental group.
[CONCLUSION] This novel approach to address the problem involving implant-related surgery close to the periapical lesion of adjacent teeth appeared safe and reliable (no.: ChiCTR2000041153). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:533-544. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9839.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A total of 25 subjects requiring GBR during implant placement in anterior areas were allocated into two groups. In the experimental group (adjacent teeth with periapical lesions) with 10 subjects, implantation and GBR were performed for edentulous areas with simultaneous EMS for adjacent teeth. In the control group (adjacent teeth without periapical lesions) with 15 subjects, implantation and GBR were performed for edentulous areas. The clinical outcomes, radiographic bone remodeling, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed.
[RESULTS] Within a 1-year follow-up, the implant survival rate was 100% in both groups, with no significant difference regarding complications. All teeth achieved complete healing following EMS. Repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) measurements revealed a significant change over time in horizontal bone widths and postoperative patient-reported outcomes, but no intergroup statistically significant differences ( > .05) in horizontal bone widths and visual analog scale scores of pain, swelling, and bleeding were observed. Likewise, the bone volumetric decrease (7.4% ± 4.5% in the experimental group and 7.1% ± 5.2% in the control group) from T1 (suture removal) to T2 (6 months after implantation) revealed no intergroup differences. The horizontal bone width gain at the implant platform was slightly lower in the experimental group ( < .05). Interestingly, the color-coded figures of both groups showed a facial reduction of grafted material in edentulous areas. However, the apical regions following EMS exhibited stable bone remodeling in the experimental group.
[CONCLUSION] This novel approach to address the problem involving implant-related surgery close to the periapical lesion of adjacent teeth appeared safe and reliable (no.: ChiCTR2000041153). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:533-544. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9839.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | microsurgery
|
미세수술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | Bone
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | Anterior
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | teeth
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | periapical lesions
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | GBR
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | pain
|
C0030193
Pain
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | swelling
|
C0013604
Edema
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | bleeding
|
C0019080
Hemorrhage
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | teeth
|
C0040426
Tooth structure
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | T2 (6
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Implants 2023;38:533-544
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Teeth
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | anterior areas
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | GBR
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Bone Regeneration; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth; Wound Healing; Mouth, Edentulous; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.
- Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.