Implant Placement with Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration in the Anterior Region Close to the Periapical Lesion of Adjacent Teeth: A Combined Treatment Strategy to Prevent Complications.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2023 Vol.38(3) p. 533-544b

Wang J, Luo Y, Huang D, Huangphattarakul V, Man Y

관련 도메인

Abstract

[PURPOSE] To evaluate the safety and performance of a potential novel strategy to resolve the above scenario by simultaneously performing implant-related surgery and endodontic microsurgery (EMS).

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A total of 25 subjects requiring GBR during implant placement in anterior areas were allocated into two groups. In the experimental group (adjacent teeth with periapical lesions) with 10 subjects, implantation and GBR were performed for edentulous areas with simultaneous EMS for adjacent teeth. In the control group (adjacent teeth without periapical lesions) with 15 subjects, implantation and GBR were performed for edentulous areas. The clinical outcomes, radiographic bone remodeling, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed.

[RESULTS] Within a 1-year follow-up, the implant survival rate was 100% in both groups, with no significant difference regarding complications. All teeth achieved complete healing following EMS. Repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) measurements revealed a significant change over time in horizontal bone widths and postoperative patient-reported outcomes, but no intergroup statistically significant differences ( > .05) in horizontal bone widths and visual analog scale scores of pain, swelling, and bleeding were observed. Likewise, the bone volumetric decrease (7.4% ± 4.5% in the experimental group and 7.1% ± 5.2% in the control group) from T1 (suture removal) to T2 (6 months after implantation) revealed no intergroup differences. The horizontal bone width gain at the implant platform was slightly lower in the experimental group ( < .05). Interestingly, the color-coded figures of both groups showed a facial reduction of grafted material in edentulous areas. However, the apical regions following EMS exhibited stable bone remodeling in the experimental group.

[CONCLUSION] This novel approach to address the problem involving implant-related surgery close to the periapical lesion of adjacent teeth appeared safe and reliable (no.: ChiCTR2000041153). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:533-544. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9839.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 microsurgery 미세수술 dict 1
해부 Bone scispacy 1
해부 Anterior scispacy 1
해부 teeth scispacy 1
합병증 periapical lesions scispacy 1
약물 GBR scispacy 1
질환 pain C0030193
Pain
scispacy 1
질환 swelling C0013604
Edema
scispacy 1
질환 bleeding C0019080
Hemorrhage
scispacy 1
질환 teeth C0040426
Tooth structure
scispacy 1
질환 T2 (6 scispacy 1
질환 Implants 2023;38:533-544 scispacy 1
기타 Teeth scispacy 1
기타 anterior areas scispacy 1
기타 GBR scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Bone Regeneration; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth; Wound Healing; Mouth, Edentulous; Treatment Outcome

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문