An Anatomical Study of Posterior Trunk Recipient Vessels, and Comparisons of Outcome following Pedicled- and Free-Flap Transfers for Treatment of Sarcoma in the Posterior Trunk.

[BACKGROUND]  Reconstruction after wide resection of a large sarcoma arising in the posterior trunk may require free-flap transfer to reduce the postoperative complications. Here, we describe the recipient vessels on the whole posterior trunk. Moreover, to show the reliability of these vessels, we describe an institutional series of free-flap reconstruction.

[METHODS]  In the cadaveric study, 20 posterior trunk regions from 10 fixed cadavers were dissected. The location and the diameter of the perforating artery and vein on the posterior were documented. In the clinical study, 54 patients undergoing immediate reconstruction surgery with only a pedicled flap ( = 45) and with a free flap ( = 9) after sarcoma resection on the posterior trunk between July 2005 and September 2021 were identified. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare the postoperative complications.

[RESULTS]  In the cadaveric study, a total of 178 perforators were identified. The average diameter of the superficial cervical artery (SCA) and vein, dorsal scapular artery (DSA) and vein, medial branch of dorsal intercostal artery perforator (m-DICAP) and vein, lateral branch of dorsal intercostal artery perforator (l-DICAP) and vein, and dorsolateral intercostal artery perforator (DLICAP) and vein were 1.03, 1.67, 1.38, 1.84, 1.28, 1.84, 1.01, 1.60, 1.11, and 1.70 mm. In the clinical study, the propensity score-matched analysis involving eight pairs showed a significantly higher occurrence of total complications in the pedicled-flap group than the free-flap group (62.5 vs. 0%,  = 0.03).

[CONCLUSION]  The cadaveric study showed that the perforators from the SCA, DSA, and posterior intercostal artery are constantly present. The clinical study demonstrated the feasibility and reliability of a free-flap transfer.