Prolonged Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis May Not Be Necessary for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Tertiary Center's 10-Year Experience.

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery 2022 Vol.38(8) p. 647-653

Huang H, Bernstein JL, Otterburn DM

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND]  Based on the 2005 Caprini Risk Assessment Model for venous thromboembolism, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons prevention guidelines would result in prolonged chemoprophylaxis (1 week or more) for the majority of patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. We aim to assess the necessity of prolonged prophylaxis by describing our institutional experience in thromboembolism prevention and evaluating the incidence of symptomatic VTE in our patient cohort.

[METHODS]  Women who underwent DIEP flap reconstruction from August 2011 to March 2020 at a tertiary care center were included. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, VTE prophylaxis regimens, and development of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism within 60 days of surgery. Caprini scores were calculated for all patients.

[RESULTS]  Out of the 249 patients included in the study, 245 patients received chemoprophylaxis only during hospitalization, while four patients additionally received anticoagulant for at least 2 weeks after discharge for prophylactic or therapeutic indications. The cohort's average Caprini score was 6.0, with 72.7% of scores between 3 and 6 and 26.5% at 7 or higher. One patient (0.4%), who scored a 7 and received prophylaxis only while hospitalized, developed deep vein thrombosis. There were no cases of pulmonary embolism. There was no significant difference in VTE rate between patients who received chemoprophylaxis consistent with ASPS guidelines and those who did not ( = 1.000).

[CONCLUSION]  Despite our limited chemoprophylaxis use in DIEP flap patients, our VTE incidence is low. This current work suggests that the blanket application of prolonged prophylaxis is not warranted, and it further serves as impetus to re-evaluate the 2005 Caprini RAM in this patient population.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 diep flap 피판재건술 dict 3
해부 breast 유방 dict 2
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 1
해부 Venous scispacy 1
해부 pulmonary scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS scispacy 1
질환 Venous Thromboembolism C1861172
Venous Thromboembolism
scispacy 1
질환 thromboembolism C0040038
Thromboembolism
scispacy 1
질환 VTE scispacy 1
질환 vein thrombosis C0042487
Venous Thrombosis
scispacy 1
질환 pulmonary embolism C0034065
Pulmonary Embolism
scispacy 1
질환 ASPS C0206293
Asp snake
scispacy 1
질환 DIEP Flap Breast scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 Women scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Anticoagulants; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문