Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty in Female-to-Male Transsexuals - A Comparison Between Gottlieb and Levine's and Chang and Hwang's Technique.

The journal of sexual medicine 2022 Vol.19(4) p. 661-668

Spennato S, Ederer IA, Borisov K, Kueenzlen L, Rothenberger J, Kühn S, Schlosshauer T, Kiehlmann M, Wehle A, Sohn M, Rieger UM

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Phalloplasty is a crucial part of female-to-male genital gender-affirming surgery, however, up to date, there is still no standardized phalloplasty technique.

[AIM] To evaluate the outcome of a single-center series of phalloplasties using the free radial forearm flap variations by Chang and Hwang vs by Gottlieb and Levine on a similar number of transgender patients.

[METHODS] Between 2018 and 2020, 45 female to male transgender patients underwent phalloplasty using a neuro-microvascular free radial forearm flap in our department. Twenty patients underwent phalloplasty by the use of the Chang and Hwang design, whereas 25 patients were subjects to a phalloplasty according to Gottlieb and Levine technique. Patients' demographics, procedural characteristics, postoperative complications, and outcome of both groups were retrospectively evaluated and compared with each other.

[RESULTS] Patients' demographics were similar in both groups. We did not observe relevant differences concerning postoperative complications comparing the two groups, except for the statistically significant lower rate of partial flap necrosis in the Gottlieb and Levine group. No statistically significant risk factors for an increase in complication rate could be identified. Urethral fistulas were the leading cause of revision.

[CLINICAL IMPLICATION] Optimizing a phalloplasty surgical technique and contributing to establish the gold standard in phalloplasty.

[STRENGTHS & LIMITATION] This retrospective study presents the first comparison between the free radial forearm flap phalloplasty by Chang and Hwang and by Gottlieb and Levine performed at the same department on a similar number of transgender patients published so far.

[CONCLUSION] The Chang and Hwang design is associated with a lower rate of urologic complications (fistulas, stenosis) while the Gottlieb and Levine design has a statistically significant lower incidence of partial flap necrosis. Future prospective trials are needed to establish the gold standard in phalloplasty. Spennato S, Ederer IA., Borisov K et al. Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty in Female-to-Male Transsexuals - A Comparison Between Gottlieb and Levine's and Chang and Hwang's Technique. J Sex Med 2022;19:661-668.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 radial forearm flap 피판재건술 dict 3
시술 free flap 피판재건술 dict 2
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 2
합병증 flap necrosis 괴사 dict 2
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 1
해부 Levine scispacy 1
해부 genital scispacy 1
해부 phalloplasties scispacy 1
해부 Sex Med scispacy 1
합병증 Urethral fistulas scispacy 1
합병증 phalloplasty scispacy 1
약물 Female-to-Male scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Phalloplasty scispacy 1
약물 Levine scispacy 1
질환 necrosis C0027540
Necrosis
scispacy 1
질환 stenosis C0678234
Stenosis Morphology
scispacy 1
질환 Radial Forearm Free Flap scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 female scispacy 1
기타 neuro-microvascular scispacy 1
기타 Borisov K scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Female; Forearm; Free Tissue Flaps; Humans; Male; Necrosis; Penis; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Gender-Affirming Surgery; Urethra

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문