Leaving the perfusion zones? Individualized flap design in 100 free DIEP and ms-TRAM flaps for autologous breast reconstruction using indocyanine green angiography.

[BACKGROUND] There is still no consensus regarding the ideal zoning in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction using free DIEP or ms-TRAM flaps. In particular, the perfusion pattern of the flap according to the number of perforators used and their location remains controversial. In this study, the perfusion of free DIEP and ms-TRAM flaps is assessed intraoperatively and analyzed with regard to different perfusion patterns.

[METHODS] A retrospective analysis of 100 free flaps for breast reconstruction was performed. Following complete flap harvest, we used indocyanine green angiography for perfusion analysis. By applying two different contour levels, DIEP flaps with lateral or medial perforators and ms-TRAM flaps were assessed for their respective perfusion patterns.

[RESULTS] No statistically significant differences were found in the size of the perfusion area between the different flap types when applying the contour level of 20% (p >0.05). For the contour level of 30%, however, statistically significant differences were found between DIEP flaps with medially or laterally located perforators (p = 0.038). Laterally or medially located perforators in DIEP flaps showed no significant differences in their ability to cross the midline (contour level 20%, p = 0.068; contour level 30%, p = 0.058).

[CONCLUSION] Considering the variability of the perfusion of the abdominal wall and the high sensitivity of indocyanine green angiography for their detection, the abdominal zonings play a minor role. By using intraoperative indocyanine green angiography, a precise and patient-specific free flap surgery for autologous breast reconstruction is possible independent of perforator location.