Microvascular Flap Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancers in Previously Operated and/or Radiated Neck: Is It Safe?

Annals of plastic surgery 2022 Vol.88(1) p. 63-67

Shankhdhar VK, Mantri MR, Wagh S, Thiagarajan S, Chaukar D, Jaiswal D, Mathews S

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Microvascular reconstruction after oncologic resection with curative intent in recurrent or second primary cancer cases is challenging not only because of the complexity of the defect but also due to difficulty in finding suitable donor vessels in the neck that has already been subjected to surgery and subsequent adjuvant treatment. In our present study, we evaluated the success of free flaps, reexplorations, and factors associated with reexploration and with flap failures in previously operated and/or radiated neck.

[METHODS] In this retrospective study, we analyzed patients who underwent microvascular reconstruction from January 2016 to December 2018 in patients with previous surgery and/or radiation, considered as "already treated neck" (ATN). These cases were reviewed to analyze variables that included age, sex, indication for surgery (recurrence, second primary, osteoradionecrosis, and secondary reconstruction), duration since previous surgery or radiation, free flap done, donor vessels used, the need to go to the contralateral neck or outside the neck, need for vein grafts, flap reexploration rate, flap survival rate, and hospital stay of the patients. We also tried to identify factors that predisposed for a reexploration after performing reconstruction with a free flap in ATN.

[RESULTS] Of 1522 free flaps done, 371 patients were included in the study. Flap success rate was 90.8% in ATN, which was comparable to naive neck (94%; P = 0.108). The reexploration rate in ATN (16.2%) was significantly higher (P = 0.0003) than in naive neck (9.8%). The previous treatment (neck dissection) received [P = 0.001; odds ratio, 13.7 (1.87-101.6)] was the most significant predisposing factor, and patients undergoing osteocutaneous flaps were more prone to undergo reexplorations (P = 0.05). Side of anastomosis, vessel used for anastomosis, comorbidities, and time since previous treatment did not affect the reexploration rate significantly.

[CONCLUSIONS] Microvascular reconstruction can be safely performed in ATN with good success rates, and it should not be a deterrent in whom free flap is required to achieve best functional outcome. However, it may be associated with increase in reexploration rates in the postoperative period. Patients having undergone a previous neck dissection are at more risk of undergoing this reexploration in comparison with radiotherapy (RT)/chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CTRT) alone.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 5
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 4
시술 free flap 피판재건술 dict 3
해부 vein grafts scispacy 1
합병증 neck scispacy 1
합병증 flaps scispacy 1
약물 CTRT → (RT)/chemotherapy and radiotherapy C4727584
Biochemotherapy
scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Microvascular scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Microvascular scispacy 1
질환 Head and Neck Cancers C0278996
Malignant Head and Neck Neoplasm
scispacy 1
질환 primary cancer C1306459
Primary malignant neoplasm
scispacy 1
질환 ATN → already treated neck" scispacy 1
질환 osteoradionecrosis C0029461
Osteoradionecrosis
scispacy 1
질환 cancer scispacy 1
기타 Microvascular Flap scispacy 1
기타 donor vessels scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 osteocutaneous flaps scispacy 1
기타 vessel scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Free Tissue Flaps; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Neck; Neck Dissection; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문