Tracheostomy in free-flap reconstruction of the oral cavity: can it be avoided? A cohort study of 187 patients.

ANZ journal of surgery 2021 Vol.91(6) p. 1246-1250

Dawson R, Phung D, Every J, Gunawardena D, Low TH, Ch'ng S, Clark J, Wykes J, Palme CE

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Head and neck surgeons are moving away from routine tracheostomy in free-flap reconstruction. We reviewed prophylactic tracheostomy use in patients undergoing oral cavity or oropharynx free-flap reconstruction to identify patient groups who avoided tracheostomy. Secondary aims were to describe complications associated with and without tracheostomy.

[METHODS] A retrospective cohort study was undertaken, using a prospectively maintained database. Inclusion criteria was free-flap reconstruction for an oral cavity or oropharyngeal defect, excluding partial or total laryngectomy. Variables collected included demographics, comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumour site and subsite, extent of resection, surgery duration, tracheostomy, complications, return to theatre and re-intubation.

[RESULTS] A total of 344 head and neck free-flap reconstructions were performed between January 2017 and July 2019. A total of 164 (87.7%) oral cavity and 23 (12.3%) oropharyngeal reconstructions were included totalling 187 free flaps. A total of 107 (57.2%) were males and 80 (42.8%) females, mean age 62.4 years (range 21-89). Of 187 patients, 100 (53.5%) underwent prophylactic tracheostomy at time of reconstruction. Longer operative time (P < 0.001), resection site (P < 0.001), number of subsites resected (P = 0.007), segmental mandibulectomy (P = 0.04), lip-split (P = 0.05), floor of mouth resection (P < 0.001), lingual release (P = 0.007), glossectomy (P < 0.001), extent of tongue resection (P < 0.001), extent of hard palate resection (P = 0.04), soft palate resection (P < 0.001) and double free-flap reconstruction (P = 0.04) were associated with tracheostomy use.

[CONCLUSION] A personalized approach to postoperative airway management allowed almost half of our cohort to avoid tracheostomy. In high-volume institutions with the necessary expertise and support, appropriately selected patients may be safely managed without routine tracheostomy.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 6
해부 oropharyngeal scispacy 1
해부 mouth scispacy 1
해부 lingual scispacy 1
해부 tongue scispacy 1
해부 palate scispacy 1
합병증 oral cavity scispacy 1
합병증 oropharynx free-flap scispacy 1
합병증 flaps scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Head and scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSION] A scispacy 1
질환 Head and neck C0460004
Head and neck structure
scispacy 1
질환 oropharyngeal defect scispacy 1
질환 comorbidity C0009488
Comorbidity
scispacy 1
질환 tumour C0027651
Neoplasms
scispacy 1
질환 head and neck free-flap scispacy 1
질환 palate C0700374
Palate
scispacy 1
기타 free-flap scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 airway scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Female; Free Tissue Flaps; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies; Tongue; Tracheostomy; Young Adult

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문