Laparoscopy allows the harvest of the DIEP flap with shorter fascial incisions as compared to endoscopic harvest: A single surgeon retrospective cohort study.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] We present a comparative series to utilize minimally invasive endoscopic, total extraperitoneal laparoscopic (TEP-lap), and transabdominal preperitoneal robotic perforator (TAP-RAP) harvest of the deep inferior epigastric (DIE) vessels for autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) to mitigate donor site morbidity. We hypothesized that TEP-lap and TAP-RAP harvests of abdominal-based free flaps are safe techniques associated with decreased fascial incision when compared with the endoscopic harvest.
[METHODS] We designed a retrospective cohort series of subjects with newly diagnosed breast cancer who presented for ABR using endoscopic (control), laparoscopic, or robotic assistance between September 2017 and April 2019. The primary outcome variables were flap success (i.e., absence of perioperative flap loss), fascial incision length, and intraoperative complications. Secondary variables included operating time, costs, and postoperative complications within 90 days (arterial thrombosis, venous congestion, bulge/hernia, and operative revision). Exclusion criteria included < 90 days follow-up.
[RESULTS] In total 94, 38, and 3 subjects underwent endoscopic, TEP-lap, and TAP-RAP flap harvests. Mean lengths of fascial incisions for the endoscopic and laparoscopic cohorts were 4.5 ± 0.5 cm and 2.0 ± 0.6 cm (p < 0.0001), while incision length depended on the concurrent procedure in the robotic cohort. No subjects required conversion to an open harvest. There were no bleeding complications, intra-abdominal injuries, flap losses, or abdominal bulges/hernias noted in the TEP-lap and TAP-RAP cohorts.
[CONCLUSION] Minimally invasive DIEP flap harvest may decrease fascial injury when compared with conventional open harvest. There are significant trade-offs among harvest methods. TEP-lap harvest may better balance the trade-off related to abdominal wall morbidity.
[METHODS] We designed a retrospective cohort series of subjects with newly diagnosed breast cancer who presented for ABR using endoscopic (control), laparoscopic, or robotic assistance between September 2017 and April 2019. The primary outcome variables were flap success (i.e., absence of perioperative flap loss), fascial incision length, and intraoperative complications. Secondary variables included operating time, costs, and postoperative complications within 90 days (arterial thrombosis, venous congestion, bulge/hernia, and operative revision). Exclusion criteria included < 90 days follow-up.
[RESULTS] In total 94, 38, and 3 subjects underwent endoscopic, TEP-lap, and TAP-RAP flap harvests. Mean lengths of fascial incisions for the endoscopic and laparoscopic cohorts were 4.5 ± 0.5 cm and 2.0 ± 0.6 cm (p < 0.0001), while incision length depended on the concurrent procedure in the robotic cohort. No subjects required conversion to an open harvest. There were no bleeding complications, intra-abdominal injuries, flap losses, or abdominal bulges/hernias noted in the TEP-lap and TAP-RAP cohorts.
[CONCLUSION] Minimally invasive DIEP flap harvest may decrease fascial injury when compared with conventional open harvest. There are significant trade-offs among harvest methods. TEP-lap harvest may better balance the trade-off related to abdominal wall morbidity.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 기법 | endoscopic
|
내시경 | dict | 6 | |
| 시술 | flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 4 | |
| 시술 | diep flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | fascial
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | fascial incisions
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | extraperitoneal laparoscopic
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal-based free flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | fascial incision
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | intra-abdominal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal wall
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | TAP-RAP
→ transabdominal preperitoneal robotic perforator
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] In
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | DIE
→ deep inferior epigastric
|
C3642467
Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | breast cancer
|
C0006142
Malignant neoplasm of breast
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | thrombosis
|
C0040053
Thrombosis
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | venous congestion
|
C0042484
Venous Engorgement
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | bleeding
|
C0019080
Hemorrhage
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | intra-abdominal injuries
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | fascial injury
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | vessels
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | TAP-RAP
→ transabdominal preperitoneal robotic perforator
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | arterial
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | venous
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Abdominal Muscles; Autografts; Breast Neoplasms; Epigastric Arteries; Fascia; Female; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Laparoscopy; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Perforator Flap; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Tissue and Organ Harvesting
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- From Palliation After Angiosarcoma Resection to Totally Autologous Aesthetic Breast Reconstruction Combining Kiss Latissimus Dorsi Flap and Contralateral Breast Sharing Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap: A Case Report.
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.