Soft Tissue Management: A Critical Part of Implant Rehabilitation After Vascularized Free-Flap Reconstruction.
Abstract
[PURPOSE] Implant rehabilitation after jaw reconstruction is challenging, and postoperative peri-implantitis is common. Our aim was to present our management protocol for implant rehabilitation after vascularized free-flap reconstruction and report the outcomes of soft tissue management.
[METHODS] This retrospective cohort study included patients who received vascularized free-flap reconstruction, implant rehabilitation, apical reposition flaps (ARFs), and free gingival grafts (FGGs) at Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from January 1, 2009 to January 1, 2020. We assessed the association of age, gender, primary disease, flap choice, number and position of implants, timing of ARFs and FGGs, fixation stent use, and restoration type with the occurrence of peri-implantitis. Probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and marginal bone loss of the implants were measured as well. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier statistics, and Cox regression analysis.
[RESULTS] In total, 19 patients with 65 implants were included. The implants were placed immediately or 7 to 44 months after reconstruction of the jaw with fibular (n = 17) or iliac flaps (n = 2). ARFs and FGGs were performed 0 to 11 months later. No implants were lost. The mean probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and marginal bone loss at 26.6 ± 16.8 months were 3.5 ± 0.9 mm, 70.4 ± 35.1%, and 0.6 ± 0.4 mm, respectively. The incidence of peri-implantitis was 32.3%, showing no significant associations with the gender, age, primary disease, flap choice, number and position of implants, timing of ARFs and FGGs, use of a fixation stent, and type of restoration based on the adjusted multivariate model (P > .05).
[CONCLUSIONS] Soft tissue management helps generate firmly attached keratinized mucosa around the implants, leads to a more precise impression, and reduces peri-implant bone loss. It should be considered as a critical part of implant rehabilitation after vascularized free-flap reconstruction.
[METHODS] This retrospective cohort study included patients who received vascularized free-flap reconstruction, implant rehabilitation, apical reposition flaps (ARFs), and free gingival grafts (FGGs) at Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from January 1, 2009 to January 1, 2020. We assessed the association of age, gender, primary disease, flap choice, number and position of implants, timing of ARFs and FGGs, fixation stent use, and restoration type with the occurrence of peri-implantitis. Probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and marginal bone loss of the implants were measured as well. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier statistics, and Cox regression analysis.
[RESULTS] In total, 19 patients with 65 implants were included. The implants were placed immediately or 7 to 44 months after reconstruction of the jaw with fibular (n = 17) or iliac flaps (n = 2). ARFs and FGGs were performed 0 to 11 months later. No implants were lost. The mean probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and marginal bone loss at 26.6 ± 16.8 months were 3.5 ± 0.9 mm, 70.4 ± 35.1%, and 0.6 ± 0.4 mm, respectively. The incidence of peri-implantitis was 32.3%, showing no significant associations with the gender, age, primary disease, flap choice, number and position of implants, timing of ARFs and FGGs, use of a fixation stent, and type of restoration based on the adjusted multivariate model (P > .05).
[CONCLUSIONS] Soft tissue management helps generate firmly attached keratinized mucosa around the implants, leads to a more precise impression, and reduces peri-implant bone loss. It should be considered as a critical part of implant rehabilitation after vascularized free-flap reconstruction.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 6 | |
| 해부 | Soft Tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | gingival grafts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | FGGs
→ free gingival grafts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | peri-implantitis
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | bone
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | jaw
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | jaw
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | ARFs
→ apical reposition flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | ± 0.4 mm, respectively.
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] Soft
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | peri-implantitis
|
C2936258
Peri-Implantitis
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | primary disease
|
C0277554
primary disorders
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | bleeding
|
C0019080
Hemorrhage
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | bone loss of the implants were measured as well.
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | bone loss
|
C0029453
Osteopenia
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | disease
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Free-Flap
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | ARFs
→ apical reposition flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | FGGs
→ free gingival grafts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | fibular
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | iliac flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | mucosa
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Alveolar Bone Loss; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Fibula; Humans; Retrospective Studies
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- From Palliation After Angiosarcoma Resection to Totally Autologous Aesthetic Breast Reconstruction Combining Kiss Latissimus Dorsi Flap and Contralateral Breast Sharing Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap: A Case Report.
- Case report of a rare soft tissue tuberculosis in a patient undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.
- Otoplasty for prominent ear: A systematic review of surgical techniques.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.