Polypropylene Mesh Complications in the Sublay Position After Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Les complications des treillis de polypropylène en sous-couche après une reconstruction mammaire par voie abdominale.
Abstract
[INTRODUCTION] Abdominal wall morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction is an important consideration for patients and surgeons. Previous studies are limited by multiple mesh locations or types. In this study, we evaluate specifically subfascial polypropylene mesh placement to determine a more definitive complication rate and basis for objective comparison.
[METHODS] A retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction at our institution by 3 surgeons from 2015 to 2018. All patients with sublay placement of polypropylene mesh were included. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, type of reconstruction, and postoperative abdominal wall complications were recorded.
[RESULTS] A total of 114 flaps were performed on 81 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 48 were deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP) flaps (42%), 43 were MS-2 TRAM flaps (37.8%), 20 were muscle sparing (MS-1) transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM) flaps (17.5%), and 3 were free TRAM flaps (2.6%). Average follow-up was 392 days (range: 29-1191). Average body mass index was 30.7. No patients developed hernias. Two patients (2.5%) complained of post-operative bulges, neither of which required operative treatment. Two patients experienced superficial abdominal wall infection, one of which required admission and intravenous antibiotics. Ten patients (12.3%) had abdominal incision dehiscence, 3 of which required operative intervention. There were no cases of mesh exposure, contamination, or removal.
[CONCLUSION] Polypropylene mesh is safe and effective, with subfascial placement resulting in low morbidity and low rates of bulge/hernia formation after microsurgical breast reconstruction. Consideration should be given to using polypropylene mesh for fascial repairs after microsurgical breast reconstruction, particularly in high-risk populations.
[METHODS] A retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction at our institution by 3 surgeons from 2015 to 2018. All patients with sublay placement of polypropylene mesh were included. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, type of reconstruction, and postoperative abdominal wall complications were recorded.
[RESULTS] A total of 114 flaps were performed on 81 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 48 were deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP) flaps (42%), 43 were MS-2 TRAM flaps (37.8%), 20 were muscle sparing (MS-1) transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM) flaps (17.5%), and 3 were free TRAM flaps (2.6%). Average follow-up was 392 days (range: 29-1191). Average body mass index was 30.7. No patients developed hernias. Two patients (2.5%) complained of post-operative bulges, neither of which required operative treatment. Two patients experienced superficial abdominal wall infection, one of which required admission and intravenous antibiotics. Ten patients (12.3%) had abdominal incision dehiscence, 3 of which required operative intervention. There were no cases of mesh exposure, contamination, or removal.
[CONCLUSION] Polypropylene mesh is safe and effective, with subfascial placement resulting in low morbidity and low rates of bulge/hernia formation after microsurgical breast reconstruction. Consideration should be given to using polypropylene mesh for fascial repairs after microsurgical breast reconstruction, particularly in high-risk populations.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 5 | |
| 재료 | polypropylene mesh
|
메쉬 | dict | 5 | |
| 기법 | subfascial
|
근막하 평면 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | muscle
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | MS-1
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | intravenous
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | fascial
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal wall
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | DIEP) flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | abdominal incision
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | infection
|
감염 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | dehiscence
|
상처열개 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | [INTRODUCTION] Abdominal wall
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | DIEP
→ deep inferior epigastric artery
|
C3642467
Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | hernias
|
C0019270
Hernia
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | abdominal wall infection
|
C1112209
Abdominal Infection
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | abdominal incision dehiscence
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | epigastric artery
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | MS-2 TRAM
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | TRAM flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | superficial abdominal wall
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- The Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination: A Scoping Review.