Biomechanical comparison of microvascular anastomoses prepared by various suturing techniques.

Injury 2020 Vol.51(12) p. 2866-2873

Szabo B, Fazekas L, Ghanem S, Godo ZA, Madar J, Apro A, Nemeth N

관련 도메인

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] The biomechanical properties of small vessels and microvascular anastomoses have not been studied completely yet. However, in case of vascular injury and various microsurgical reconstructive procedures a safe anastomosis is essential. Quick and reliable tests are needed to test various anastomoses in research and in teaching courses as well for quality control and proper feedback. We aimed to compare selected biomechanical properties of the simple interrupted, the continuous suture and the modified Lauritzen's sleeve-technique.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Sixty femoral arteries from chicken thigh biopreparates and 12 abdominal aortas from rats were used in this study. In case of the pressure resistance test the groups were: the simple interrupted, the continuous suture and the modified Lauritzen's sleeve-technique. The tensile-strength, elongation and elasticity measurement groups were the simple interrupted and continuous sutures with 8 and 12 stitches. Furthermore the suture materials in various conditions (simple thread, knotted threads, stitch with intact and damaged threads) were also compared. The tensile-strength and the pressure probe devices were custom made in cooperation with the Faculty of Informatics.

[RESULTS] The average diameter of the chicken femoral arteries was 3.25±0.38 mm. The sleeve-technique showed the biggest pressure drop (56±16.41 mmHg), however, it was the fastest method. The tensile-strength of simple interrupted suture was 4.55±0.7 Newton (N), being lower than of the intact vessel (6.8 ± 1.4 N). The tensile-strength did not differ significantly between the 12-stitch simple interrupted and continuous sutures, however, the latter was stronger. The anastomoses made on thread model were significantly stronger than the ones on vessels.

[CONCLUSION] The main variables were the number of stitches and the strength of the vessel. The pressure drop was not correlated with the stitch number. One incorrect stitch can dramatically increase the leakage. Although the sleeve-technique is quick to be performed, it cannot withstand high pressure. The suture material itself is far stronger then the vessel. The vessel tensile strength was decreased in the anastomoses. For the given vessel diameter more than 8 stitches should be used.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 2
해부 vessels scispacy 1
약물 ± 1.4 N) scispacy 1
약물 [INTRODUCTION] The scispacy 1
약물 12-stitch scispacy 1
질환 vascular injury C0178324
Vascular System Injuries
scispacy 1
질환 sleeve-technique scispacy 1
기타 vascular scispacy 1
기타 femoral arteries scispacy 1
기타 chicken thigh biopreparates scispacy 1
기타 rats scispacy 1
기타 chicken femoral arteries scispacy 1
기타 vessel scispacy 1
기타 sleeve-technique scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Anastomosis, Surgical; Animals; Microsurgery; Rats; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Tensile Strength

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문