Machine Learning for Predicting Complications in Head and Neck Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer.

The Laryngoscope 2020 Vol.130(12) p. E843-E849

Formeister EJ, Baum R, Knott PD, Seth R, Ha P, Ryan W, El-Sayed I, George J, Larson A, Plonowska K, Heaton C

관련 도메인

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS] Machine learning (ML) is a type of artificial intelligence wherein a computer learns patterns and associations between variables to correctly predict outcomes. The objectives of this study were to 1) use a ML platform to identify factors important in predicting surgical complications in patients undergoing head and neck free tissue transfer, and 2) compare ML outputs to traditionally employed logistic regression models.

[STUDY DESIGN] Retrospective cohort study.

[METHODS] Using a dataset of 364 consecutive patients who underwent head and neck microvascular free tissue transfer at a single institution, 14 clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed using a supervised ML algorithm of ensemble decision trees to predict surgical complications. The relative importance values of each variable in the ML analysis were then compared to logistic regression models.

[RESULTS] There were 166 surgical complications, which included bleeding or hematoma in 30 patients (8.2%), fistulae in 25 patients (6.9%), and infection or dehiscence in 52 patients (14.4%). There were 59 take-backs (16.2%), and six total (1.6%) and five partial (1.4%) flap failures. ML models were able to correctly classify outcomes with an accuracy of 65% to 75%. Factors that were identified in ML analyses as most important for predicting complications included institutional experience, flap ischemia time, age, and smoking pack-years. In contrast, the significant factors most frequently identified in traditional logistic regression analyses were patient age (P = .03), flap type (P = .03), and primary site of reconstruction (P = .06).

[CONCLUSIONS] In this single-institution dataset, ML algorithms identified factors for predicting complications after free tissue transfer that were distinct from traditional regression models.

[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] 2c Laryngoscope, 2020.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 3
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 2
해부 tissue scispacy 1
합병증 hematoma 혈종 dict 1
합병증 infection 감염 dict 1
합병증 dehiscence 상처열개 dict 1
합병증 flap type scispacy 1
약물 OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS] Machine learning scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 Head and Neck Microvascular scispacy 1
질환 head and neck free tissue transfer scispacy 1
질환 bleeding C0019080
Hemorrhage
scispacy 1
질환 ischemia C0022116
Ischemia
scispacy 1
질환 Head and Neck Microvascular Free Tissue scispacy 1
질환 head and neck free tissue scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Female; Free Tissue Flaps; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Machine Learning; Male; Microvessels; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문