Application of Three-Dimensional Printed Vascular Modeling as a Perioperative Guide to Perforator Mapping and Pedicle Dissection during Abdominal Flap Harvest for Breast Reconstruction.

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery 2020 Vol.36(5) p. 325-338

DeFazio MV, Arribas EM, Ahmad FI, Le-Petross HT, Liu J, Chu CK, Santiago L, Clemens MW

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND]  Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing have enabled production of patient-specific guides to aid perforator mapping and pedicle dissection during abdominal flap harvest. We present our early experience using this tool to navigate deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) topography and evaluate its impact on operative efficiency and clinical outcomes.

[PATIENTS AND METHODS]  Between January 2013 and December 2018, a total of 50 women underwent computed tomographic angiography (CTA)-guided perforator mapping prior to abdominal flap breast reconstruction, with ( = 9) and without ( = 41) 3D-printed vascular modeling (3DVM). Models were assessed for their accuracy in identifying perforator location and source-vessel anatomy, as determined by operative findings from 18 hemi-abdomens. The margin of error (MOE) for perforator localization using 3DVM was calculated and compared with CTA-derived measurements for the same patients. Flap harvest times, outcomes, and complications for patients who were preoperatively mapped using 3DVM versus CTA alone were analyzed.

[RESULTS]  Overall, complete concordance was observed between 3DVM and operative findings with regards to perforator number, source-vessel origin, and DIEA branching pattern. By comparison, CTA interpretation of these parameters inaccurately identified branching pattern and perforator source-vessel origin in 28 and 33% of hemi-abdomens, respectively ( = 0.045 and  = 0.02). Compared with operative measurements, the average MOE for perforator localization using 3DVM was significantly lower than that obtained from CTA alone (0.81 vs. 8.71 mm,  < 0.0001). Reference of 3D-printed models, intraoperatively, was associated with a mean reduction in flap harvest time by 21 minutes (60.7 vs. 81.7 minutes,  < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, rates of perforator-level injury, microvascular insufficiency, and fat necrosis were lower among patients mapped using 3DVM.

[CONCLUSION]  The results of this study support the accuracy of 3DVM for identifying DIEA topography and perforator location. Application of this technology may translate to enhanced operative efficiency and fewer perfusion-related complications for patients undergoing abdominal free flap breast reconstruction.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 5
해부 breast 유방 dict 3
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 1
시술 free flap 피판재건술 dict 1
해부 Perforator scispacy 1
해부 pedicle scispacy 1
해부 source-vessel scispacy 1
해부 fat scispacy 1
합병증 necrosis 괴사 dict 1
합병증 perforator scispacy 1
합병증 abdominal flap scispacy 1
합병증 hemi-abdomens scispacy 1
합병증 abdominal free scispacy 1
합병증 flap breast scispacy 1
약물 DIEA → deep inferior epigastric artery C3642467
Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery
scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
질환 microvascular insufficiency scispacy 1
질환 perforator source-vessel scispacy 1
기타 Vascular scispacy 1
기타 epigastric artery scispacy 1
기타 women scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 perforator scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Adult; Aged; Computed Tomography Angiography; Dissection; Epigastric Arteries; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Patient-Specific Modeling; Perforator Flap; Printing, Three-Dimensional

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문