A Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis of 35,052 Smooth vs Textured Implants in Breast Reconstruction and Augmentation.

Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum 2026 Vol.8() p. ojag032

Tanas Y, Tanas S, Tanas J, Cato L, Nguyen P, Wang J, Ghorab H, Swed S, Spiegel A

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Whether texturing confers clinical advantages over smooth breast implants remains questionable, especially in the wake of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma concerns with textured implants.

[OBJECTIVES] The aim of this study was to compare complications, implant-specific events, and patient-reported outcomes between smooth and textured implants across augmentation and reconstruction.

[METHODS] Following PRISMA 2020, the authors synthesized head-to-head comparative studies through January 15, 2025. Random-effects models estimated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for BREAST-Q domains; heterogeneity ( ) guided prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses (eg, implant plane and exclusion of overlapping or historical cohorts). Review Manager v5.4 was used for statistical analysis.

[RESULTS] Thirty-three studies comprising 35,052 implants met inclusion criteria. In the initial pooled analysis, smooth implants showed higher capsular contracture (RR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.36-2.11, < .00001; with significant heterogeneity, = 79%, < .00001); nonetheless, after stratifying by plane (subpectoral and prepectoral) and conducting sensitivity analyses that excluded overlapping/historical cohorts, the difference was no longer statistically significant (RR = 1.13, 95% CI, 0.82-1.56, = .46) with no subgroup differences ( = 0%, = .92). Infection was lower with smooth implants (RR = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.89, = .02). No differences were detected for seroma, hematoma, rippling, rupture, malposition/rotation, explantation, or BREAST-Q domains.

[CONCLUSIONS] In contemporary, plane-matched comparisons with appropriate sensitivity analyses, smooth implants did not demonstrate a higher capsular contracture risk and were associated with lower infection risk compared with textured implants. Other complications and patient-reported outcomes were similar among both groups.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 5
합병증 infection 감염 dict 2
합병증 capsular contracture 피막구축 dict 2
해부 Smooth scispacy 1
합병증 hematoma 혈종 dict 1
합병증 seroma 장액종 dict 1
합병증 implant-specific scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVES] scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
기법 subpectoral 근막하 평면 dict 1
질환 breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma C4528210
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma
scispacy 1
질환 rupture C3203359
Rupture
scispacy 1
질환 lower infection scispacy 1
질환 smooth breast scispacy 1
질환 smooth scispacy 1
질환 RRs → risk ratios scispacy 1

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문