A Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis of 35,052 Smooth vs Textured Implants in Breast Reconstruction and Augmentation.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Whether texturing confers clinical advantages over smooth breast implants remains questionable, especially in the wake of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma concerns with textured implants.
[OBJECTIVES] The aim of this study was to compare complications, implant-specific events, and patient-reported outcomes between smooth and textured implants across augmentation and reconstruction.
[METHODS] Following PRISMA 2020, the authors synthesized head-to-head comparative studies through January 15, 2025. Random-effects models estimated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for BREAST-Q domains; heterogeneity ( ) guided prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses (eg, implant plane and exclusion of overlapping or historical cohorts). Review Manager v5.4 was used for statistical analysis.
[RESULTS] Thirty-three studies comprising 35,052 implants met inclusion criteria. In the initial pooled analysis, smooth implants showed higher capsular contracture (RR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.36-2.11, < .00001; with significant heterogeneity, = 79%, < .00001); nonetheless, after stratifying by plane (subpectoral and prepectoral) and conducting sensitivity analyses that excluded overlapping/historical cohorts, the difference was no longer statistically significant (RR = 1.13, 95% CI, 0.82-1.56, = .46) with no subgroup differences ( = 0%, = .92). Infection was lower with smooth implants (RR = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.89, = .02). No differences were detected for seroma, hematoma, rippling, rupture, malposition/rotation, explantation, or BREAST-Q domains.
[CONCLUSIONS] In contemporary, plane-matched comparisons with appropriate sensitivity analyses, smooth implants did not demonstrate a higher capsular contracture risk and were associated with lower infection risk compared with textured implants. Other complications and patient-reported outcomes were similar among both groups.
[OBJECTIVES] The aim of this study was to compare complications, implant-specific events, and patient-reported outcomes between smooth and textured implants across augmentation and reconstruction.
[METHODS] Following PRISMA 2020, the authors synthesized head-to-head comparative studies through January 15, 2025. Random-effects models estimated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for BREAST-Q domains; heterogeneity ( ) guided prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses (eg, implant plane and exclusion of overlapping or historical cohorts). Review Manager v5.4 was used for statistical analysis.
[RESULTS] Thirty-three studies comprising 35,052 implants met inclusion criteria. In the initial pooled analysis, smooth implants showed higher capsular contracture (RR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.36-2.11, < .00001; with significant heterogeneity, = 79%, < .00001); nonetheless, after stratifying by plane (subpectoral and prepectoral) and conducting sensitivity analyses that excluded overlapping/historical cohorts, the difference was no longer statistically significant (RR = 1.13, 95% CI, 0.82-1.56, = .46) with no subgroup differences ( = 0%, = .92). Infection was lower with smooth implants (RR = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.89, = .02). No differences were detected for seroma, hematoma, rippling, rupture, malposition/rotation, explantation, or BREAST-Q domains.
[CONCLUSIONS] In contemporary, plane-matched comparisons with appropriate sensitivity analyses, smooth implants did not demonstrate a higher capsular contracture risk and were associated with lower infection risk compared with textured implants. Other complications and patient-reported outcomes were similar among both groups.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 5 | |
| 합병증 | infection
|
감염 | dict | 2 | |
| 합병증 | capsular contracture
|
피막구축 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | Smooth
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | hematoma
|
혈종 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | seroma
|
장액종 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | implant-specific
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVES]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기법 | subpectoral
|
근막하 평면 | dict | 1 | |
| 질환 | breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma
|
C4528210
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | rupture
|
C3203359
Rupture
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | lower infection
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | smooth breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | smooth
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | RRs
→ risk ratios
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- The Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination: A Scoping Review.