Complications following Primary Implant-Based Gluteal Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2025 Vol.156(6) p. 894-907

Elsaftawy A, Bonczar M, Jagosz M, Ostrowski P

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Gluteal augmentation is a widely performed aesthetic procedure, with implants providing a reliable alternative for patients with insufficient donor fat or those seeking a more pronounced and predictable volume enhancement. However, complication rates remain a concern, and it is unclear how different surgical techniques influence outcomes such as wound dehiscence, seroma formation, capsular contracture, and implant malposition. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and complication rates associated with implant-based gluteal augmentation, with a focus on how different surgical and procedural factors may influence these outcomes.

[METHODS] A systematic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Risk-of-Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions, Version 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and publication bias was analyzed using funnel plots and the LFK (Luis Furuya-Kanamori) index.

[RESULTS] A total of 32 studies comprising 2682 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Textured implants had higher complication rates, including seromas (7.50% versus 2.56%), dehiscence (13.98% versus 6.63%), and capsular contracture (2.06% versus 0.55%), compared with smooth implants. Subfascial placement had the highest seroma (22.25%) and dehiscence (27.07%) rates, whereas intramuscular and submuscular placements showed lower complication rates. The overall implant removal rate was 1.05%, with subfascial placement exhibiting the highest rate (5.23%).

[CONCLUSIONS] Implant-based gluteal augmentation remains a viable option, but careful selection of surgical technique is crucial to minimize complications. Although intramuscular and submuscular placement appear safer, further prospective, standardized studies with long-term follow-up are needed to refine surgical strategies and improve patient outcomes.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 gluteal augmentation 엉덩이성형 dict 4
합병증 seroma 장액종 dict 2
합병증 capsular contracture 피막구축 dict 2
합병증 dehiscence 상처열개 dict 2
기법 subfascial 근막하 평면 dict 2
기법 submuscular 근막하 평면 dict 2
해부 smooth scispacy 1
해부 intramuscular scispacy 1
해부 gluteal scispacy 1
합병증 Gluteal scispacy 1
합병증 wound scispacy 1
합병증 seroma ( scispacy 1
합병증 wound dehiscence 상처열개 dict 1
약물 LFK scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Gluteal augmentation scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Implant-based scispacy 1
질환 Risk-of-Bias scispacy 1
질환 seromas C0262627
Seroma
scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 capsular scispacy 1
기타 implant-based gluteal scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Buttocks; Postoperative Complications; Prostheses and Implants; Seroma; Body Contouring

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문