Comparison of revision surgery after implant-based breast reconstruction between smooth, textured, and polyurethane-covered implants: results from the Dutch Breast Implant Registry.

The British journal of surgery 2025 Vol.112(5)

Harmeling JX, Vrolijk JJ, Heeg E, Becherer BE, Rakhorst HA, Corten EML, Fiocco M, Mureau MAM

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common technique after mastectomy. Breast implants are categorized by surface type as smooth, textured, or polyurethane-covered, each with specific attributed advantages and complication profiles. High-quality comparative studies are, however, limited. This study compared revision incidence and indications for revision among these implant types.

[METHODS] A prospective, nationwide cohort from the Dutch Breast Implant Registry was analysed. Permanent implants used between 2017 and 2022 for direct-to-implant or two-stage reconstruction were included. Surface-related revision was the primary outcome. Cumulative incidences were estimated using a competing risk model. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HRcs) were calculated using univariable and multivariable models, accounting for implant clustering and confounders. Subgroup analyses examined revisions for specific complications.

[RESULTS] Of 3996 implants, 76.9% were textured, 12.4% smooth, and 10.8% polyurethane-covered. At 4 years, the cumulative incidence of revision surgeries did not differ between textured (11.1%; 95% c.i. = 9.9 to 12.5), smooth (13.0%; 95% c.i. = 8.5 to 18.4), and polyurethane-covered (16.1%; 95% c.i. = 12.4 to 20.2) implants. Multivariable analysis found no association between surface type and surface-related revision. Subgroup analysis however revealed that polyurethane-covered implants had increased hazards of revision for capsular contracture (HRcs = 2.49; 95% c.i. = 1.24 to 5.01) and asymmetry (HRcs = 2.31; 95% c.i. = 1.33 to 4.02).

[CONCLUSION] After adjusting for confounders and clustering, surface-related revision in a reconstructive setting did not significantly different among breast implant surface types overall. Polyurethane-covered implants may, however, require more revisions due to capsular contracture and asymmetry.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 6
합병증 capsular contracture 피막구축 dict 2
합병증 asymmetry 비대칭 dict 2
해부 smooth scispacy 1
약물 polyurethane-covered scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Implant-based scispacy 1
질환 contracture C0009917
Contracture
scispacy 1
질환 smooth scispacy 1
질환 Breast Implant scispacy 1
질환 Breast implants scispacy 1
질환 breast implant surface types scispacy 1
기타 capsular scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Breast Implants; Reoperation; Polyurethanes; Netherlands; Middle Aged; Registries; Prospective Studies; Breast Implantation; Adult; Prosthesis Design; Postoperative Complications; Mastectomy; Breast Neoplasms; Prosthesis Failure; Aged; Incidence; Surface Properties

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문