Evaluation of the Safety of a GalaFLEX-AlloDerm Construct in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is gaining in popularity. Acellular dermal matrices are an integral part of prepectoral reconstruction. However, large quantities of acellular dermal matrix are required for total implant coverage, and the cost of acellular dermal matrices could be a deterrent to reconstruction. To minimize the cost, the authors have resorted to the use of a bioabsorbable mesh, GalaFLEX, as a partial replacement to acellular dermal matrices. This study evaluates the comparative safety of using a GalaFLEX-AlloDerm construct versus AlloDerm alone in prepectoral reconstruction.
[METHODS] Consecutive patients who underwent immediate, expander-implant, prepectoral breast reconstruction were included in this retrospective study. Patients were stratified into two groups: those who received the GalaFLEX-AlloDerm combination versus AlloDerm alone. In GalaFLEX-AlloDerm reconstructions, the lower third of the expander was covered by the AlloDerm, whereas the rest of the expander was covered by GalaFLEX. Complications following reconstruction were compared between the groups.
[RESULTS] AlloDerm alone was used in 128 patients (249 breasts) and GalaFLEX-AlloDerm was used in 135 patients (250 breasts). The rate of any complication was 7.6 percent in the AlloDerm-alone group and 6.4 percent in the GalaFLEX-AlloDerm group. The rate of infection, major skin necrosis, seroma, capsular contracture, prosthesis exposure/extrusion, and prosthesis loss were less than or equal to 3.0 percent in the GalaFLEX-AlloDerm group and did not differ significantly from those in the AlloDerm-only group.
[CONCLUSIONS] GalaFLEX bioabsorbable matrix is a less costly alternative to acellular dermal matrices in two-stage, prepectoral reconstruction with comparable safety outcomes. Further long-term data and clinical experience are needed to better understand the safety of this matrix for use in breast reconstruction.
[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, III.
[METHODS] Consecutive patients who underwent immediate, expander-implant, prepectoral breast reconstruction were included in this retrospective study. Patients were stratified into two groups: those who received the GalaFLEX-AlloDerm combination versus AlloDerm alone. In GalaFLEX-AlloDerm reconstructions, the lower third of the expander was covered by the AlloDerm, whereas the rest of the expander was covered by GalaFLEX. Complications following reconstruction were compared between the groups.
[RESULTS] AlloDerm alone was used in 128 patients (249 breasts) and GalaFLEX-AlloDerm was used in 135 patients (250 breasts). The rate of any complication was 7.6 percent in the AlloDerm-alone group and 6.4 percent in the GalaFLEX-AlloDerm group. The rate of infection, major skin necrosis, seroma, capsular contracture, prosthesis exposure/extrusion, and prosthesis loss were less than or equal to 3.0 percent in the GalaFLEX-AlloDerm group and did not differ significantly from those in the AlloDerm-only group.
[CONCLUSIONS] GalaFLEX bioabsorbable matrix is a less costly alternative to acellular dermal matrices in two-stage, prepectoral reconstruction with comparable safety outcomes. Further long-term data and clinical experience are needed to better understand the safety of this matrix for use in breast reconstruction.
[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, III.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 재료 | alloderm
|
무세포진피기질 | dict | 13 | |
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 4 | |
| 해부 | prepectoral
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | AlloDerm-alone
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | matrix
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | seroma
|
장액종 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | infection
|
감염 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | skin necrosis
|
괴사 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | capsular contracture
|
피막구축 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | Acellular dermal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | expander-implant
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | prepectoral breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 재료 | acellular dermal matrix
|
무세포진피기질 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Prepectoral implant-based breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | GalaFLEX-AlloDerm
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] AlloDerm
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] GalaFLEX bioabsorbable matrix
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | prosthesis loss
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Prepectoral Breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | GalaFLEX
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | GalaFLEX-AlloDerm
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | capsular
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Acellular Dermis; Breast Implantation; Breast Implants; Breast Neoplasms; Collagen; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- The Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination: A Scoping Review.