What is the best technic to dislodge Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm on medical implants?

BMC microbiology 2022 Vol.22(1) p. 192

Moris V, Lam M, Amoureux L, Magallon A, Guilloteau A, Maldiney T, Zwetyenga N, Falentin-Daudre C, Neuwirth C

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Bacterial biofilm can occur on all medical implanted devices and lead to infection and/or dysfunction of the device. In this study, artificial biofilm was formed on four different medical implants (silicone, piccline, peripheral venous catheter and endotracheal tube) of interest for our daily clinical and/or research practice. We investigated the best conventional technic to dislodge the biofilm on the implants and quantified the number of bacteria. Staphylococcus epidermidis previously isolated from a breast implant capsular contracture on a patient in the university hospital of Dijon was selected for its ability to produce biofilm on the implants. Different technics (sonication, Digest-EUR®, mechanized bead mill, combination of sonication plus Digest-EUR®) were tested and compared to detach the biofilm before quantifying viable bacteria by colony counting.

[RESULTS] For all treatments, the optical and scanning electron microscope images showed substantial less biofilm biomass remaining on the silicone implant compared to non-treated implant. This study demonstrated that the US procedure was statistically superior to the other physical treatment: beads, Digest-EUR® alone and Digest-EUR® + US (p < 0.001) for the flexible materials (picc-line, PIV, and silicone). The number of bacteria released by the US is significantly higher with a difference of 1 log on each material. The result for a rigid endotracheal tube were different with superiority for the chemical treatment dithiothreitol: Digest-EUR®. Surprisingly the combination of the US plus Digest-EUR® treatment was consistently inferior for the four materials.

[CONCLUSIONS] Depending on the materials used, the biofilm dislodging technique must be adapted. The US procedure was the best technic to dislodge S. epidermidis biofilm on silicone, piccline, peripheral venous catheter but not endotracheal tube. This suggested that scientists should compare themselves different methods before designing a protocol of biofilm study on a given material.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 1
해부 tube scispacy 1
합병증 infection 감염 dict 1
합병증 capsular contracture 피막구축 dict 1
재료 silicone implant 실리콘 보형물 dict 1
약물 silicone C0037114
silicones
scispacy 1
약물 piccline scispacy 1
약물 epidermidis scispacy 1
약물 picc-line scispacy 1
약물 dithiothreitol C0012789
Dithiothreitol
scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Bacterial biofilm scispacy 1
약물 biofilm scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 breast implant capsular contracture C2349571
Capsular contracture of breast implant
scispacy 1
질환 S. epidermidis biofilm scispacy 1
기타 peripheral venous scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Biofilms; Humans; Silicones; Sonication; Staphylococcus epidermidis

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문