Optimal breast reconstruction type for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy followed by radiation therapy.

Breast cancer research and treatment 2020 Vol.183(1) p. 127-136

Naoum GE, Oladeru OT, Niemierko A, Salama L, Winograd J, Colwell A, Arafat WO, Smith B, Ho A, Taghian AG

관련 도메인

Abstract

[PURPOSE] To explore the optimal type of breast reconstruction and the time interval to postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) associated with lower complications in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

[METHODS] We reviewed the medical records of 300 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy with breast reconstruction and PMRT at our institution from 2000 to 2017. Reconstruction types included autologous flaps (AR), single-stage-direct-to-implant and two-stages expander/implant (TE/I). The primary endpoint was the rate of reconstruction complications including infection, skin and fat necrosis. Subgroup analysis compared rates of capsular contracture, implant rupture, implant exposure and overall implant failure in single-stage-direct-to-implant to TE/I. The secondary endpoint was identifying the time interval between surgery with immediate implant-based reconstruction and PMRT associated with lower probability of implant failure. Logistic regression models, Kaplan-Meier estimates and Polynomial regression were used to assess endpoints.

[RESULTS] The median follow-up was 43.5 months. 29.3%, 28.3% and 42.4% of the cohort had AR, TE/I and single-stage-direct-to-implant D, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate of complications was 14.0%, 29.7% and 19.4% for AR, TE/I and single-stage-direct-to-implant, respectively (Log rank p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed significant association between TE/I and higher risk of infection (OR 8.1, p = 0.009) compared to AR, while single-stage-direct-to-implant and AR were comparable (OR 3.2, p = 0.2). On subgroup analysis, TE/I was significantly associated with higher rates of implant failure. The mean wait time to deliver PMRT after immediate reconstruction with no adjuvant chemotherapy was 8.4 and 10.7 weeks in single-stage-direct-to-implant and TE/I, respectively (p < 0.005). Delivering PMRT after 8 weeks of surgery yielded 10% probability of reconstruction failure in single-stage-direct-to-implant versus 40% in TE/I.

[CONCLUSION] In comparison to two stages reconstruction, single-stage-direct-to-implant following neoadjuvant chemotherapy has lower complications and offers timely delivery of PMRT.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 4
합병증 infection 감염 dict 2
해부 TE/I → two-stages expander/implant scispacy 1
해부 skin scispacy 1
해부 fat scispacy 1
해부 capsular scispacy 1
합병증 necrosis 괴사 dict 1
합병증 capsular contracture 피막구축 dict 1
합병증 implant rupture 보형물 파열 dict 1
합병증 TE/I → two-stages expander/implant scispacy 1
질환 breast cancer C0006142
Malignant neoplasm of breast
scispacy 1
질환 TE/I → two-stages expander/implant scispacy 1
질환 implant failure C0854676
Implant Failure
scispacy 1
질환 breast cancer patients scispacy 1
질환 PMRT → postmastectomy radiotherapy scispacy 1
기타 TE/I. [CONCLUSION] scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Adult; Breast Implants; Breast Neoplasms; Combined Modality Therapy; Fat Necrosis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Implant Capsular Contracture; Incidence; Lymph Node Excision; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Seroma; Surgical Flaps; Surgical Wound Infection; Tissue Expansion Devices

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문