Comparison of the capsular response to the Biocell RTV and Mentor 1600 Siltex breast implant surface texturing: a scanning electron microscopic study.

The utility of mammary prosthesis texturing in the prevention of capsular contracture was established some 20 years ago. Various models of implant texturing are currently on the market. We decided to study two of the most popular implants with two different surface texturings: the Biocell RTV and the Mentor 1600 Siltex. An observation at the electron microscopic level of the implants' surfaces was achieved. At the time of a prospective survey on 10 patients, the capsule fragments corresponding to these two prostheses have been analyzed at the electron microscopic level. All prostheses were removed from the patients because of asymmetry or bad positioning. The aim of our study was to establish a correlation between these two frequent texturing surfaces and their corresponding capsules. Our results showed that only the Biocell's capsules present a mirror image with correspondence of the depressions on the prosthesis and contacts on the capsule. This phenomenon seems linked to the existence of a critical size of the pores constituting the implant surface. This observation leads us to the hypothesis of an adhesive effect between the prosthesis and its capsule. If this last is not directly linked to the prevention of capsular contracture, it can have an effect on implant stabilization in the primary mammary reconstruction and in the secondary corrections of asymmetry or bad position.