Surgical Management of Textured Breast Implants: Assessing Risk and Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2024 Vol.154(1) p. 39-52

Plotsker EL, Stern CS, Graziano FD, Rubenstein RN, Vingan PS, Haglich K, Monge J, Disa JJ, Mehrara BJ, Dayan JH, Allen R, Matros E, McCarthy C, Nelson JA

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Textured implants have been linked to breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). Patients who undergo explantation have options for reconstruction, but data on safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are limited. The purpose of this study was to classify complications and PROs in patients opting for surgical management of textured implants.

[METHODS] Complication rates and BREAST-Q scores were compared between (1) asymptomatic patients who underwent conversion from textured to smooth implants ( n = 224), (2) symptomatic patients who underwent conversion from textured to smooth implants ( n = 83), (3) patients who underwent explantation without replacement ( n = 44), and (4) patients who underwent replacement with autologous reconstruction ( n = 33). Linear regression examined PROs controlling for clinical and surgical variables.

[RESULTS] Overall complication rates in 384 patients (637 implants) differed across groups ( P = 0.034), with the highest rate (25%) in patients who underwent explantation without replacement. These patients were specifically more impacted by minor complications, notably seroma. Capsulectomy extent did not significantly impact complications. Asymptomatic and symptomatic smooth implant patients had improvements in Satisfaction with Breasts ( P < 0.05). Autologous reconstruction patients had significant improvements in Satisfaction with Breasts sustained after 3 months postoperatively ( P < 0.01) and Sexual Well-being sustained after 6-months postoperatively ( P < 0.05). Patients who underwent removal without replacement had lower Physical Well-being of the Chest scores at 1 year or more than the other groups.

[CONCLUSIONS] Replacement of textured implants with smooth implants or flaps is safe and is associated with improved satisfaction with breasts and quality of life. The degree of capsulectomy does not appear to impact the incidence of perioperative complications.

[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, III.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 3
해부 smooth scispacy 1
해부 Capsulectomy scispacy 1
해부 Breasts scispacy 1
합병증 seroma 장액종 dict 1
합병증 bia-alcl 보형물연관 역형성대세포림프종 dict 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Textured implants have scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma C4528210
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma
scispacy 1
질환 Breasts C0006141
Breast
scispacy 1
질환 Breast Implants scispacy 1
질환 PROs → patient-reported outcomes scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Breast Implants; Female; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Middle Aged; Adult; Breast Implantation; Postoperative Complications; Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Anaplastic; Device Removal; Prosthesis Design; Patient Satisfaction; Risk Assessment; Retrospective Studies; Breast Neoplasms; Aged; Quality of Life

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문