← 뒤로

The selection of patients for breast reduction: should health commissions have a say?

British journal of plastic surgery 1999 Vol.52(2) p. 118-21

Horlock N, Cole RP, Rossi AR

관련 도메인

Abstract

Selective or restrictive access policies operate for breast reduction, despite proven benefits. The rationale for these policies, in particular the requirement of psychiatric assessment prior to a plastic surgical consultation, as an aid to patient selection by the health commission, was examined in 57 general practice referrals to a plastic surgical unit. In 22 cases, these policies deterred the patient or GP from pursuing the referral further. Sixteen cases were funded by the health commission directly, 16 patients required psychiatric or orthopaedic referrals, and three patients were refused funding outright. The decision to fund, reject or refer to a non-plastic-surgical specialist was not statistically related to the patients' symptoms. Non-plastic-surgical assessment resulted in referral for a plastic surgical opinion in 15 of 16 patients. We conclude that these selective policies are unsatisfactory, since patient management is not related to symptoms and the use of non-plastic-surgical opinions by the health commission as an aid to rationing is of little benefit.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 breast reduction 유방성형술 dict 2
해부 breast 유방 dict 2
질환 psychiatric C0033873
Psychiatry Specialty
scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Contract Services; England; Family Practice; Female; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Mammaplasty; Mental Health Services; Patient Selection; Referral and Consultation; Surgery, Plastic

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

관련 논문