Are We Teaching Evidence-Based and Inclusive Practices in Gender-Affirming Care? Perspectives From Plastic Surgery In-Service Examinations.
4/5 보강
연도별 인용 (2024–2026) · 합계 7
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
【연구 목적】 성형외과 레지던트의 교육 우선순위 설정과 보드 시험 준비를 위한 연간 인서비스 시험(ISE)이 성별 확인 치료(gender-affirming care) 교육에서 소외된 영역임을 고려할 때, 성형외과 ISE 내 성별 확인 수술(gender-affirming surgery, GAS) 관련 콘텐츠의 질과 포용성을 평가하는 것이 본 연구의 핵심 목표
APA
Zain Aryanpour, Dominic Min-Tran, et al. (2023). Are We Teaching Evidence-Based and Inclusive Practices in Gender-Affirming Care? Perspectives From Plastic Surgery In-Service Examinations.. Journal of graduate medical education, 15(5), 587-591. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00611.1
MLA
Zain Aryanpour, et al.. "Are We Teaching Evidence-Based and Inclusive Practices in Gender-Affirming Care? Perspectives From Plastic Surgery In-Service Examinations.." Journal of graduate medical education, vol. 15, no. 5, 2023, pp. 587-591.
PMID
37781442
Abstract
Resident physicians take annual in-service examinations (ISEs) as part of continuing medical education, which set educational priorities, allow for formative feedback, and guide preparation for final board examinations. Gender-affirming care is provided in many specialties but has been an underrepresented area in medical education. Plastic surgeons provide a large portion of gender-affirming surgical care. Educational gaps in standardized ISEs may contribute to ongoing health care disparities for transgender and gender diverse people. To evaluate the quality of content pertaining to gender-affirming surgery (GAS) on plastic surgery ISEs. Plastic surgery ISEs from years 2012 to 2020 were accessed online through the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons website in June 2022. All 5 gender diverse authors analyzed examinations for the presence of GAS questions; identified questions were analyzed for quantity, organization based on content category, affirming language, and accuracy against current guidelines. Of 1959 ISE questions available for review, 11 GAS questions were identified for a total frequency of 0.56%. Most GAS questions (6 of 11, 55%) were miscategorized. Inappropriate language, including misgendering of patients, occurred in 7 of 11 (64%) questions. No questions discussed GAS beyond chest or genital surgery, or common variations of these procedures. Transgender identities were represented as only binary, with no mention of nonbinary or gender-fluid individuals. Our study illustrates that there are significant gaps in educational content pertaining to gender-affirming care on plastic surgery ISEs.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | genital
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | GAS
→ gender-affirming surgery
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | people
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; United States; Surgery, Plastic; Internship and Residency; Transgender Persons; Gender-Affirming Surgery; Healthcare Disparities; Male; Female
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)
- Abdominal Peripheral Nerve Blocks Do Not Impact Postoperative Pain in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.
- Comprehensiveness of Online Information in Gender-Affirming Surgery: Current Trends and Future Directions in Academic Plastic Surgery.
- The Future of the Plastic Surgery Match: Implications of Applicant Familiarity.
- Impact of Research Output on the Future of the Plastic Surgery Match.